About this Research Topic
The evolvement of the way we work has also gained traction in the organizational psychology field in relation to remote working. Since the Covid-19 pandemic, many workforces have adapted permanently to this form of working. However, controversy about its effects on performance and the individual constructs that influence or moderate these relations. This editorial initiative of particular relevance led by Professor José Peiró, Specialty Chief Editor of the Performance and Development section, alongside Dr. Ron Landis, is focused on individual performance related constructs in relation to remote working. Additionally, how these individual constructs then apply to organizational performance and development.
Where performance constructs are diverse and often multifaceted at the organizational level, this Research Topic solicits high-quality submissions that address the impact or implications of remote work and workers’ characteristics and environmental conditions, on performance constructs such as:
• Task or in-role performance
• Extra-role performance
• Adaptive and creative performance
• Counterproductive behavior
• Absenteeism (especially sick-leave), ‘presenteeism’, turnover, and related topics
• Initiatives to learn and grow to improve performance or development opportunities in their jobs
• Behaviors and strategies for career development
Authors are encouraged to identify the greatest challenges in organizational performance, development and productivity from an individual level construct, and how to address those challenges. The goal of this special edition Research Topic is to inspire, inform and provide direction and guidance to researchers in the field who are particularly interested in the remote workforce.
Keywords: remote workforce, hybrid working, performance, counterproductive work behaviour, turnover, absenteeism, home working, remote work
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.