About this Research Topic
In the context of diabetic care, this Research Topic focus on:
1) Scientifically validated evidence, such as clinical trials and studies, to inform treatment decisions
2) How healthcare professionals can justify their knowledge claims, treatment strategies, and recommendations
3) Applying principles of skepticism to diabetic care to help individuals, including patients and healthcare providers, critically evaluate treatment options, assess the reliability of health information, and make informed decisions about diabetes management
4)In diabetic care, patient empowerment and shared decision-making are crucial. Patients should be active participants in their own care, with their knowledge, beliefs, and experiences taken into account alongside medical expertise
5) Acknowledging the limitations of current knowledge encourages a mindset of continuous learning and adaptation, ensuring that diabetic care remains up-to-date and responsive to new insights and developments
Specific sub-themes include: Philosophy of mind and thoughts in diabetic care; Ontology; Skeptic diabetic care, Clinical trials rationality, Nature of knowledge in diabetic care, treatment rationality, and phenomenology in diabetic care.
Type of manuscript: Narrative Review; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Scoping review; Original articles; Case studies; Case Review; Hypothesis; Qualitative studies; Philosophical Review; Discussion; Editorials; Communication; Notes
Keywords: Epistemology, inequality, phenomenology, philosophy, ontology
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.