Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of knowledge and can indeed have implications for diabetic care. Epistemology deals with questions about how knowledge is acquired, justified, and evaluated. When applied to diabetic care, it can address issues related to evidence-based medicine, justification of knowledge claims, critical thinking, skepticism, patient empowerment and shared decision-making. Epistemology emphasizes the importance of evidence and rationality in acquiring knowledge. Epistemology helps ensure that medical interventions and recommendations are based on reliable and well-founded evidence rather than personal anecdotes or unsupported claims. Epistemology provides the framework for evaluating the validity and reliability of knowledge claims. It is needed to demonstrate that their claims are supported by reliable evidence, adhere to established medical guidelines, and have a sound logical and scientific basis. Epistemology encourages critical thinking and skepticism, promoting the examination of assumptions, biases, and fallacies in the pursuit of knowledge. Epistemology also acknowledges the importance of individual perspectives and experiences in knowledge acquisition. Epistemological concepts, such as the recognition of diverse sources of knowledge, can foster collaborative decision-making processes between healthcare professionals and patients. Epistemology recognizes that knowledge is often uncertain and subject to revision.
In the context of diabetic care, this Research Topic focus on:
1) Scientifically validated evidence, such as clinical trials and studies, to inform treatment decisions
2) How healthcare professionals can justify their knowledge claims, treatment strategies, and recommendations
3) Applying principles of skepticism to diabetic care to help individuals, including patients and healthcare providers, critically evaluate treatment options, assess the reliability of health information, and make informed decisions about diabetes management
4)In diabetic care, patient empowerment and shared decision-making are crucial. Patients should be active participants in their own care, with their knowledge, beliefs, and experiences taken into account alongside medical expertise
5) Acknowledging the limitations of current knowledge encourages a mindset of continuous learning and adaptation, ensuring that diabetic care remains up-to-date and responsive to new insights and developments
Specific sub-themes include: Philosophy of mind and thoughts in diabetic care; Ontology; Skeptic diabetic care, Clinical trials rationality, Nature of knowledge in diabetic care, treatment rationality, and phenomenology in diabetic care.
Type of manuscript: Narrative Review; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Scoping review; Original articles; Case studies; Case Review; Hypothesis; Qualitative studies; Philosophical Review; Discussion; Editorials; Communication; Notes
Keywords:
Epistemology, inequality, phenomenology, philosophy, ontology
Important Note:
All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of knowledge and can indeed have implications for diabetic care. Epistemology deals with questions about how knowledge is acquired, justified, and evaluated. When applied to diabetic care, it can address issues related to evidence-based medicine, justification of knowledge claims, critical thinking, skepticism, patient empowerment and shared decision-making. Epistemology emphasizes the importance of evidence and rationality in acquiring knowledge. Epistemology helps ensure that medical interventions and recommendations are based on reliable and well-founded evidence rather than personal anecdotes or unsupported claims. Epistemology provides the framework for evaluating the validity and reliability of knowledge claims. It is needed to demonstrate that their claims are supported by reliable evidence, adhere to established medical guidelines, and have a sound logical and scientific basis. Epistemology encourages critical thinking and skepticism, promoting the examination of assumptions, biases, and fallacies in the pursuit of knowledge. Epistemology also acknowledges the importance of individual perspectives and experiences in knowledge acquisition. Epistemological concepts, such as the recognition of diverse sources of knowledge, can foster collaborative decision-making processes between healthcare professionals and patients. Epistemology recognizes that knowledge is often uncertain and subject to revision.
In the context of diabetic care, this Research Topic focus on:
1) Scientifically validated evidence, such as clinical trials and studies, to inform treatment decisions
2) How healthcare professionals can justify their knowledge claims, treatment strategies, and recommendations
3) Applying principles of skepticism to diabetic care to help individuals, including patients and healthcare providers, critically evaluate treatment options, assess the reliability of health information, and make informed decisions about diabetes management
4)In diabetic care, patient empowerment and shared decision-making are crucial. Patients should be active participants in their own care, with their knowledge, beliefs, and experiences taken into account alongside medical expertise
5) Acknowledging the limitations of current knowledge encourages a mindset of continuous learning and adaptation, ensuring that diabetic care remains up-to-date and responsive to new insights and developments
Specific sub-themes include: Philosophy of mind and thoughts in diabetic care; Ontology; Skeptic diabetic care, Clinical trials rationality, Nature of knowledge in diabetic care, treatment rationality, and phenomenology in diabetic care.
Type of manuscript: Narrative Review; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Scoping review; Original articles; Case studies; Case Review; Hypothesis; Qualitative studies; Philosophical Review; Discussion; Editorials; Communication; Notes
Keywords:
Epistemology, inequality, phenomenology, philosophy, ontology
Important Note:
All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.