About this Research Topic
There is a wide diversity of global experiences where gender research has analyzed how gender differences influence needs, preferences and potential benefits from crop varieties and crop specific traits. Some of these experiences were able to successfully integrate results and learning from gender research into breeding processes and decisions, while some have failed to demonstrate concrete actionable results in breeding programs.
The overall goal of this collection is to promote the documentation of cases and experiences across crops, geographies and institutional frameworks to provide a comprehensive overview of factors that influence how, when and why results from gender research can trigger changes in breeding priorities, processes or decisions, and how to better design structural innovations across different regional and institutional contexts.
In particular, this collection seeks to bring together studies that focus on:
• Case studies on integration of gender in breeding processes or decisions.
• Documentation of methodological innovations in gender in plant breeding research
• Critical analysis of strategies used to integrate multidisciplinary work into defining breeding objectives, and the challenges addressed.
• Critical analysis of institutional arrangements and partner strategies that foster gender equitable plant breeding research systems
• Historical perspectives of the integration of gender in plant breeding programs
• Evolution of breeding priorities in specific programs
• Power dynamics in interdisciplinary plant breeding teams
• Intrahousehold analysis of trait and varietal preferences
Keywords: organizational structures, breeding priority setting, research methods, power and empowerment
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.