Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1496063
This article is part of the Research Topic Sustainable Diets with Sociocultural and Economic Considerations View all 14 articles

A sustainability comparison of different traditional Chilean culinary preparations through an innovative method

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Chile, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile
  • 2 University of Chile, Santiago, Chile

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Dietary choices affect both human and planetary health, but are not always linked in public policies. The incorporation of sustainability in Food Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDGs) is inconsistent. To date, no universal methods exist to assess together the Food and Agriculture Organization's 5 sustainability dimensions (nutritional, environmental, cultural, physical, and economical access). The objective of this study was to compare the levels of sustainability of traditional Chilean culinary preparations using a newly proposed method that integrates five unique dimensions of sustainable diets with reference databases to generate recommendations about sustainable culinary preparations; in which the Chilean population serves as a test case.A database composed of 651 traditional Chilean culinary preparations was used. It was obtained through 10 focus groups from the Metropolitan Region. Culinary preparations were divided into 8 different food groups based on its main ingredients. Sustainability estimations were conducted for physically accessible preparations. All the dimensions were estimated based on approaches and indicators previously used in scientific literature. Different weights were provided for all other dimensions: 30% for cultural and price, respectively, and 20% for nutritional and environmental dimensions. Culinary preparations we recommended as sustainable if it achieved a global sustainability score of 66% or above, provided each dimension individually scored 40% or above.After data management, 351 culinary preparations were analyzed. 94 were selected as sustainable: 21/38 vegetables; 6/7 fruits; 28/105 proteins; 14/78 cereals; 6/41 soups; 0/32 dairy; 1/6 lipids; 18/443 beverages. The main reason a preparation was not classified as sustainable was failing to obtain 66% of global sustainability. No culinary preparations were excluded based on the economic dimension.This study shows that estimating sustainability of individual culinary preparations based on the FAO's 5 dimensions of sustainable diets is possible through the development of an innovative methodological approach that is useful for making dietary recommendations for a population, such as within FBDGs. Future research should continue developing this methodology as a tool for public health decision making for healthier and sustainable diets. This would allow dietary patterns to develop into more sustainable ones, which is a useful strategy for public health as well as planetary health.

    Keywords: Sustainable diets, Traditional preparations, Estimation method, Socio-cultural, Food based dietary guidelines

    Received: 13 Sep 2024; Accepted: 31 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Tiboni Oschilewski, Corvalan and Kanter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Rebecca Kanter, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.