data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Digital Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1548900
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The study aims at gaining insights into relationships between perceived institutional support and students' perceptions of AI-supported learning. It also investigates the mediating role perceived learning outcomes and moderating effect of technology self-efficacy within this context. Research model was developed and validated based on Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and the learning outcomes of students. Using quantitative research design and convenience sampling technique, 204 students from higher education institutions were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships. The results revealed that perceived institutional support significantly impacts students' perceptions of AI-supported learning (β = 0.492, C.R. = 9.671, p < 0.001),technology self-efficacy (β= 0.455, C.R. = 4.534, p<0.001), and learning outcomes. Additionally, technology self-efficacy was found negative moderating effect (β = -0.146, CR = -2.507, p = 0.012) the relationship between perceived institutional support and AI-supported learning perceptions. Perceived learning outcome partial mediated the relationship between perceived institutional support and students' perceptions of AI-supported learning, with a direct effect of (β = 0.155, p < 0.001) and an indirect effect of (β = 0.539, p < 0.001), as evidenced by the confidence interval [0.235, 0.549]. These findings highlight the significant interplay of perceived institutional support, technology self-efficacy, and perceived learning outcomes in shaping students' perceptions of AI in higher education, underscoring the importance of fostering supportive academic environments for effective AI integration. The theoretical and practical implications of the study are discussed.
Keywords: perceived institutional support, AI-supported learning, Technology self-efficacy, Perceived learning outcomes, Higher Education Justified, Space Before: Auto, After: Auto, Adjust space between Latin and Asian text
Received: 20 Dec 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mohamud. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Abdulkadir Jeilani Mohamud, Mogadishu University, Mogadishu, Somalia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.