About this Research Topic
Ergo, the combination of these two distinct approaches offers innumerable opportunities. The contribution of neuropsychology may vary from the distinction of pathological, borderline and normal behavioral patterns to the large range of quantitative questionnaire or investigational psychological measures. All these parameters may be correlated or associated in another way with structural, microstructural or functional measures. The combination of functional and structural connectivity may be of great importance, with the ability to provide further information about engaged or affected networks of neural nodes. Further research projects may focus on the componential neural structures and functional informational processes in task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging, underlying individual differences in intellectual abilities. And let’s not forget the possible path towards early detection of subclinical consequences of various diseases, based on both neuropsychology and imaging measures, with the monitoring of progression over time and eventual therapeutic interventions. The options are countless.
In this Research Topic, several of the above-stated points will be addressed in original research articles utilizing both novel and well-established MRI measures. The studies will cover physiological, borderline and clearly pathological states. Moreover, a review article summarizing the current literature on this promising, quickly developing field will be included.
All in all, although neuropsychological assessment measures and complex imaging outcomes may be sometimes difficult to interpret, their combination may yet offer a new and important understanding of the basic principles our brains are built upon.
Keywords: Structural MRI, Functional MRI, neuropsychology, behavioral measures, connectivity.
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.