About this Research Topic
An interesting question that arises is that given the essential requirement of rapid face processing in our daily interactions, how is face processing impacted by desease? Do face processing deficits differ across desease populations? For this and many other reasons, face processing is among the most important research areas in cognitive science.
This topic will present research with 2 aims: a. to advance our knowledge of face processing from a cognitive science perspective (computational fast fourier spectra/Principal Component Analysis that link structural properties of visual
stimuli, such as faces, with multi-voxel patterns in the ventral stream as well as the use of various techniques (behavioural/fMRI/EEG) to explore face processing from attention-independent, early senory detection to attention-dependent, elaborate processing and b. because some samples consist of patient populations, a secondary aim is bringing forth evidence from special populations in face processing and new ways of thinking about face processing (e.g. cognitive biases for mood-congruent faces in mood disorders). Patient populations offer new ways of thinking of face science that have important implications for cognitive science as a field.
Debates and Issues brought forth by this topic: What compromises must be made for the brain to recognize faces quickly and accurately? And what does that indicate about how the human brain functions in general? What goes wrong in the brain in certain deseases that impairs face processing? What is the relationship between early sensory processing, higher-level perception, and cognitive processes such as attention under both automatic (online) and controlled (offline) processing conditions?
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.