Robotic surgery has become a leading option for various surgical procedures in recent years, both malignant and benign. Procedures such as radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, and radical cystectomy, as well as various reconstructive surgeries, are now performed using robot-assisted techniques. These methods offer perioperative and postoperative outcomes that are at least equivalent, if not superior, to traditional surgery. However, there is an ongoing challenge in establishing structured education and training protocols for robot-assisted surgery.
The traditional Halstedian principle of "see one, do one, teach one" no longer adequately represents the current state of surgical education and practice. The primary objective of this research topic is to address the gap by developing, testing, and validating standardized protocols for comprehensive training.
Key goals include the creation of simulation-based curricula that encompass both dry and wet lab experiences, ensuring proficiency in operative skills prior to live patient interaction. It also involves integrating continuous assessment tools and feedback mechanisms to monitor and enhance trainee progress. Moreover, examining the incorporation of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies, alongside traditional mentorship, can offer immersive learning experiences that bridge theoretical knowledge and practical expertise. By establishing these robust educational infrastructures, the ultimate aim is to ensure patient safety, improve surgical outcomes, and advance the overall field of robotic genitourinary surgery.
This research topic aims to present the current trends in surgical education for robot-assisted genitourinary surgery and to explore the methods and tasks used in the teaching process, both before and during exposure to the robotic console. We welcome contributions that address the following areas, but are not limited to:
• Current trends in surgical education specific to robot-assisted genitourinary surgery;
• Innovative methods and tasks for teaching robotic surgery;
• Simulation training techniques, including dry and wet labs;
• Integration and impact of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in surgical training;
• Continuous assessment tools and feedback mechanisms for trainee development;
• Development and evaluation of standardized training protocols.
The following article types are welcome, but not limited to: original articles, systematic reviews, mini-reviews, comprehensive reviews on educational methods in robotic surgery, policy and practice reviews, and opinion articles. We hope this Research Topic will advance the training and education of future robotic surgeons, ultimately enhancing surgical proficiency and patient care.
Keywords:
robotics, surgical education, genitourinary surgery, training, structured curricula
Important Note:
All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.
Robotic surgery has become a leading option for various surgical procedures in recent years, both malignant and benign. Procedures such as radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, and radical cystectomy, as well as various reconstructive surgeries, are now performed using robot-assisted techniques. These methods offer perioperative and postoperative outcomes that are at least equivalent, if not superior, to traditional surgery. However, there is an ongoing challenge in establishing structured education and training protocols for robot-assisted surgery.
The traditional Halstedian principle of "see one, do one, teach one" no longer adequately represents the current state of surgical education and practice. The primary objective of this research topic is to address the gap by developing, testing, and validating standardized protocols for comprehensive training.
Key goals include the creation of simulation-based curricula that encompass both dry and wet lab experiences, ensuring proficiency in operative skills prior to live patient interaction. It also involves integrating continuous assessment tools and feedback mechanisms to monitor and enhance trainee progress. Moreover, examining the incorporation of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies, alongside traditional mentorship, can offer immersive learning experiences that bridge theoretical knowledge and practical expertise. By establishing these robust educational infrastructures, the ultimate aim is to ensure patient safety, improve surgical outcomes, and advance the overall field of robotic genitourinary surgery.
This research topic aims to present the current trends in surgical education for robot-assisted genitourinary surgery and to explore the methods and tasks used in the teaching process, both before and during exposure to the robotic console. We welcome contributions that address the following areas, but are not limited to:
• Current trends in surgical education specific to robot-assisted genitourinary surgery;
• Innovative methods and tasks for teaching robotic surgery;
• Simulation training techniques, including dry and wet labs;
• Integration and impact of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in surgical training;
• Continuous assessment tools and feedback mechanisms for trainee development;
• Development and evaluation of standardized training protocols.
The following article types are welcome, but not limited to: original articles, systematic reviews, mini-reviews, comprehensive reviews on educational methods in robotic surgery, policy and practice reviews, and opinion articles. We hope this Research Topic will advance the training and education of future robotic surgeons, ultimately enhancing surgical proficiency and patient care.
Keywords:
robotics, surgical education, genitourinary surgery, training, structured curricula
Important Note:
All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.