About this Research Topic
This Research Topic is the second volume of the Research Topic 'Clinical Implementation of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview', please see the first volume here .
The first volume uncovered significant insights into the integration of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) within psychiatric practice, incorporating clinical insights from the United States, Sweden and the Netherlands. These uncovered challenges such as testing, implementation assessment, fidelity concerns, training, and application across diverse demographic groups. Building upon these findings, there remains a crucial need to deepen our understanding of the CFI's operational and therapeutic efficacy, which prompts further exploration within and beyond these initial research findings.
This Research Topic aims to build on these foundations, proposing an inquiry into both established and novel applications of the CFI. Specifically, it seeks to examine the CFI's efficacy throughout the clinical process, assess its impact within a dual framework of qualitative and quantitative research, and explore its applicability across different psychiatric and non-psychiatric diagnoses. Additionally, this topic will consider theoretical perspectives that evaluate the nature and functionality of the CFI, alongside its integration into culturally competent diagnostic protocols.
To gain further insights in streamlining and enhancing CFI applications, we welcome articles addressing, but not limited to, the following themes:
- Practical insights into the widespread implementation of the CFI in varied clinical settings;
- Ethical and protocol adjustments necessary for integrating the CFI across different cultural boundaries;
- Cultural and structural considerations in healthcare assessments beyond psychiatry;
- Research protocols that incorporate the CFI in their design;
- Educational strategies for training clinicians and students in the application of the CFI.
The first volume uncovered significant insights into the integration of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) within psychiatric practice, incorporating clinical insights from the United States, Sweden and the Netherlands. These uncovered challenges such as testing, implementation assessment, fidelity concerns, training, and application across diverse demographic groups. Building upon these findings, there remains a crucial need to deepen our understanding of the CFI's operational and therapeutic efficacy, which prompts further exploration within and beyond these initial research findings.
This Research Topic aims to build on these foundations, proposing an inquiry into both established and novel applications of the CFI. Specifically, it seeks to examine the CFI's efficacy throughout the clinical process, assess its impact within a dual framework of qualitative and quantitative research, and explore its applicability across different psychiatric and non-psychiatric diagnoses. Additionally, this topic will consider theoretical perspectives that evaluate the nature and functionality of the CFI, alongside its integration into culturally competent diagnostic protocols.
To gain further insights in streamlining and enhancing CFI applications, we welcome articles addressing, but not limited to, the following themes:
- Practical insights into the widespread implementation of the CFI in varied clinical settings;
- Ethical and protocol adjustments necessary for integrating the CFI across different cultural boundaries;
- Cultural and structural considerations in healthcare assessments beyond psychiatry;
- Research protocols that incorporate the CFI in their design;
- Educational strategies for training clinicians and students in the application of the CFI.
Keywords: DSM-5, clinical implementations, CFI, cultural formulation interview
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.
