About this Research Topic
In the first volume eight original research articles were published, based on research in psychiatric clinical contexts in the United States, Sweden and the Netherlands. Several important issues were raised in relation to testing, implementation, assessment, fidelity concerns, training, and use of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) with both minority and majority populations. This volume aims to explore and expand the topic through research articles covering the original and also these additional research areas:
- Further exploration of implementing the CFI throughout the clinical process;
- Diverse uses of the CFI in both qualitative and quantitative research studies;
- Accepted and ethically-approved study protocols based on or including the CFI
- Cultural and existential health dimensions of the CFI;
- Theoretical articles, based on clinical experience and research, on the nature and function of the CFI as an Intervention;
- Use of the CFI with patients with specific psychiatric as well as other diagnoses.
Culture and context influence the expression and interpretation of symptoms of distress and thus complicate transcultural psychiatric diagnostics. Standard instruments may not adequately reflect the experience of psychiatric disorders across cultures. Diagnostic difficulties increase the risk that mental health disorders, particularly among ethnic minorities, migrants, and refugees go undetected, are not diagnosed within a reasonable time frame, or are misdiagnosed. Incorrect diagnoses and poor quality of psychiatric assessment can lead to poor treatment adherence, sub-optimal treatment, and even lack of treatment. The DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) has been developed as a person-centered instrument to guide an individual cultural assessment during the clinical diagnostic process. The use of the CFI in majority populations, and in other healthcare contexts are additional topics needing to be examined. Research is needed for evaluating the outcome of clinical implementation of the CFI, suggestions for refinement and improvement of the CFI, and culturally sensitive psychiatric assessment.
The CFI in DSM-5 is the first standardized protocol aimed to support clinically sensitive psychiatric assessment. There is a need for clinical implementation research from diverse cultural, social, and geographical contexts to evaluate the usefulness of the CFI in its present form and to define needs for future refinement and improvement. There is also a need of research on training of clinicians and students in using the CFI in order to develop best practice. Use of the CFI in non-psychiatric healthcare contexts is underway, with both minority and majority populations. In these healthcare contexts the CFI may not only add different dimensions to the diagnostic process but also serve to better-inform treatment protocols.
This Research Topic invites manuscripts on the following topics:
- Clinical implementation of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI);
- Suggestions for refinement of the CFI;
- Training in using the CFI with clinicians and medical students in psychiatry and in other branches of health care;
- Using the CFI as a training instrument in the education of clinicians;
- Combing cultural and structural competency in psychiatric assessment;
- Combining cultural and structural competency in healthcare assessment in areas outside of psychiatry.
Keywords: DSM-5, clinical implementations, CFI, cultural formulation interview
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.