About this Research Topic
This research topic aims to increase knowledge about the applications of telehealth in the field of neuropsychological assessment and cognitive intervention across the lifespan. Specifically, it seeks to evaluate the reliability of tele-administered neuropsychological tests compared to their face-to-face counterparts and to gather normative data for tele-administered versions of classical neuropsychological tools. The research will also explore models for various types of virtual visits, including clinical interviews, consultations, follow-up visits and rehabilitation sessions, as well as patient and provider experiences and satisfaction with telemedicine. Furthermore, the research will address issues of digital literacy and social and financial barriers to the effective implementation of t-NPs.
To gather further insights into the methodological and technical issues of tele-neuropsychology, we welcome articles addressing, but not limited to, the following themes:
• Comparative studies on the reliability and validity of tele-administered versus face-to-face neuropsychological tests.
• Normative data collection for tele-administered neuropsychological tools.
• Models for virtual visit types, including clinical interviews, consultations, and follow-up visits.
• Models of remote cognitive rehabilitation
• Patient and provider experiences and satisfaction with tele-neuropsychology.
• Digital literacy and its impact on the effectiveness of tele-neuropsychology.
• Social and financial barriers to the implementation of tele-neuropsychology.
• Tele-neuropsychology applications in pediatric populations.
• Ethical considerations in tele-neuropsychology practice.
Keywords: methodological issues, technical issues, Neuropsychology: Remote cognitive
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.