About this Research Topic
From an evolutionary perspective, daily changes in lighting provide a predictable photic environment. However, in modern society, the widespread use of artificial lights and lifestyle changes have posed challenges to the innate design of our circadian system. Inappropriate photic environments (e.g. lights at night) are associated with reduced sleep qualities, disrupted immune regulations, and increased risk for cardiometabolic diseases. Despite these concerning associations, the awareness of reducing photic disruptions in patients remains relatively new in the practice of disease management. For example, contemporary lighting strategies in the living environment and healthcare facilities are primarily designed for the human visual system; yet, the underlying circadian disruptions are commonly overlooked.
This research topic aims to address the idea that patients can experience well-being and enhanced treatment efficacy through optimized treatments and healing environments that consider circadian hygiene:
• Studies unraveling mechanisms underlying impacts of the photic environment on disease development risks and progressions are encouraged to be submitted.
• Clinical studies or case reports that address whether maintaining a robust photic environment in ICUs can benefit patients in life-threatening conditions are welcomed.
• We also invite submissions of interventions (e.g. tailoring the spectral content of the photic environment, appropriately timed exogenous melatonin) counteracting poor circadian hygiene.
• Reviews with insights on standardization of terminology and measures of photic environment in new study designs, and research topics mentioned above, are invited.
Keywords: circadian rhythms, photic environment, circadian disruptions, disease modifier, circadian-based therapy, circadian-based intervention, light pollution, melanopsin, light at night, melatonin, artificial light
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.