About this Research Topic
However, policies, practices and lessons from NBS vary globally and remain underexplored in different contexts. Even though the evidence of its effectiveness is growing, there are some cases where policy and management underestimate NBS options and the investment for NBS remain relatively lower especially in developing countries, due to questionable feasibility of those measures in different contexts, poor governance, and limited funding sources especially after the Covid-19 pandemic. The existing frameworks to link different actors (e.g., governments, research institutions, private sectors, financial sectors, news agencies, local communities) and green solutions (e.g., NBS, GI, SCP) are still inadequate. Current research has focused on the production of scientific knowledge and the assessment of technocratic indicators, as such, the policy, institutional arrangement, knowledge transfer, perception and participation within NBS projects need to be paid more attention to enable a faster process of social acceptance of such program.
This research topic will focus on the transition of NBS at the science-policy-practice interface. We welcome interdisciplinary research about NBS and other similar concepts from the global cases to enhance sustainability, resilience, inclusion, diversity, equality and justice. The themes include:
• Practical examples of NBS implementation to enhance sustainability and resilience.
• Barriers, limitations and shortcomings based on learnt case study examples of NBS.
• Assessing multiple scientific and societal benefits of NBS.
• Human-nature interactions of NBS in the city.
• Perceptions, participatory strategies/approaches and social learning for NBS.
• Network and stakeholder engagement, knowledge transfer and governance within NBS projects.
Keywords: NBS Governance, NBS Policy, NBS Practice, Stakeholders, Perception and Participation
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.