About this Research Topic
The contributions of local knowledge and human emotions to wildlife conservation have been insufficiently documented and discussed in the scientific literature. To recognise these contributions, this Research Topic invites manuscripts that improve and expand our understanding of how local knowledge and human emotions have been applied in managing and conserving wild animal species (both vertebrates and invertebrates) worldwide. Contributions may range from descriptive and qualitative assessments to rigorous quantitative research focused on specific groups and animal species, including case studies and comparative surveys at different temporal and geographical scales. Papers emerging from diverse disciplines such as anthropology, ethnobiology, psychology, sociology, wildlife management, and others may be appropriate for this topic. Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary studies are also welcome.
Potential themes to be addressed in the papers submitted to this Research Topic may include:
• Specific or integrative assessments of wildlife management and conservation by communities or social groups using local/traditional knowledge based on experience.
• Studies using qualitative or quantitative methods to analyze worldviews, emotions, values, and attitudes relevant to managing and conserving wild species or groups.
• Historic and cross-cultural analyses of local knowledge and emotions related to wildlife management and conservation among social groups coexisting in shared environments or independent territories.
• Assessments of the interrelationships between local knowledge and emotions toward wildlife.
• Bibliographic and critical reviews of documented local/traditional knowledge and emotions toward wildlife present in Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities worldwide.
Keywords: conservation, emotions, local knowledge, management, wildlife
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.