Use of Behavioral Metrics and Measures in Government

  • 2,371

    Total downloads

  • 35k

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Governments throughout the world have continually attempted to derive and apply various metrics and measures to assess and improve their ability to deliver on their respective missions. Within the federal government of the United States, for instance, traditional metrics such as those related to organizational performance measurement have been codified into law and are continually required of all federal agencies (e.g., the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 and the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010). These metrics and measures have been supplemented by a newer generation of parameters that aim to measure and capture data and information related to various aspects of federal and organizational efficiency, effectiveness, and impact (e.g., FedStat, StateStat, Altmetrics).

Despite the recent explosion in the number of metrics and measures used to assess government efficiency and performance, one area of measurement and analytics remains comparatively under-explored and undocumented: behavioral metrics. This area of assessment represents the most important of all because it attempts to describe and measure (if not predict) human behaviors. The commercial sector utilizes behavioral metrics and measures in a predictive sense. Amazon and Google, for instance, filter content based on an individual user's browsing (i.e., behavioral) history. Conversely and perhaps rather regretfully, there also exist examples of behavioral metrics used inappropriately, that is to say without sufficient internal or organizational controls in place. The most recent example of such inappropriate use is the cautionary tale of Massachusetts-based Cambridge Analytica and the ensuing legal battle that led to the company's eventual demise. In this latter case, procedures regarding informed consent were either lacking or non-existent. Still, these examples illustrate the expanding use of behavioral metrics and measures (e.g., within the commercial arena in the former case and within the political arena in the latter case). Both illustrate the expanding use of this form of measurement and analytics.

The objective of this Research Topic is to catalog and understand the use of behavioral metrics and measures within the area of government (e.g., federal, state, local) and to derive a series of best practices regarding their potential application or use therein. As mentioned in the preceding section above, the private sector (e.g., Amazon and Google) provides an existent and readily available comparative benchmark for the use of such measures. Thus, through the submission of original articles and the associated quantitative/semi-quantitative data related to them, this Topic aims to address the following types of questions:

• How are behavioral metrics and measures used in federal, state, or local government? What empirical or prior studies support their use, adoption, and utility within the government sector? How rigorous, stringent, and reproducible are these studies?
• Given their publicly documented potential for misuse (e.g., Cambridge Analytica), how are behavioral metrics and measures used by government agencies selected, vetted, and subject to stringent internal controls? How do these controls affect the utility of information derived from these measures? Can a balance between control and utility be achieved? Are there best practices that can be derived or applied regarding the appropriate use of behavioral metrics and measures?
• How do behavioral metrics and measures compare with other, more traditional organizational metrics and measures, such as those used to assess performance (e.g., GPRA, GPRAMA measures and CAP Goals) or risk (e.g., key risk indicators)? What specific advantages and disadvantages are associated with their application and use?

Understanding the specific uses of behavioral metrics and measures will ensure their appropriate, evidence-based, and fitness-for-purpose application within the government sector, a sector whose decisions influence the lives of many. The development of such a knowledge base is important given the increasingly widespread use of behavioral metrics in the federal sector despite the lack of sufficient evidence for their adoption (e.g., use of behavior-based screening and interview questions for federal positions).

The themes capable of being addressed by this topic are reflected by and in the specific questions articulated above (see preceding section). To address these themes, the types of manuscripts envisioned and hoped for include: original research articles, meta-analyses, reviews, and commentary with sufficient attribution.

Research Topic Research topic image

Keywords: behavior, metrics, measures, measurement, government, improvement

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.