About this Research Topic
AI research is an emerging field in endoscopy. However, in clinical practice, AI is still at a very early stage of development. Both technical and user-related problems exist with AI applications. For example, regarding automated polyp detection it is unclear whether AI leads to a prolongation of withdrawal time during colonoscopy. Further applications e.g. AI solutions for Barrett's esophagus are poorly studied. Although data volume is increasing there is a lack of studies dealing with the applicability and clinical impact of AI devices in endoscopy. In this Research Topic we seek papers addressing clinical problems especially at the stage of clinical application in endoscopy.
The aim of this Research Topic is to collect high-quality papers on AI research in the field of endoscopy. The planned issue should be clinically oriented which means that mere computer science contributions are not desired. All kinds of papers (case reports, original contributions, reviews) dealing with clinical aspects of AI in endoscopy are welcome. If possible, we would like to present at least one original contribution in this collection. The most relevant AI topics are currently (i) polyp characterization in the colon, (ii) detection or characterization of neoplastic Barrett's esophagus and (iii) diagnostic yield in small bowel capsule endoscopy. However, all other endoscopy AI topics are to be welcomed. We would like to motivate leading researchers to present their data in our Research Topic.
Topic Editor W.K. is co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of Docbot. Topic Editor T.R. received speaking fees from the following companies: Pentax Medical, Olympus Medical, Mauna Kea Technologies, Medtronic and Takeda Pharmaceuticals.
Topic Editors P.K. and B.W. have no competing interest in regards to the Research Topic subject.
Keywords: automated AI, polyp, endoscopy, colorectal characterization, Barrett machine
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.