About this Research Topic
Within the epistemological and methodological framework of qualitative research, we aim to:
- Study groups across work, educational, healthcare, clinical, community-based, and political settings from an interdisciplinary perspective.
- Collect and describe -across contexts- the perspectives and concepts used to study groups, the variety of group’s characteristics.
- The contribution that being in a group brings to the phenomena under scrutiny, the methods used in the studies.
By encouraging multiple approaches, we aim to explore new ways of thinking of groups and to discuss the grouping potential in different settings.
The focus of this Research Topic is to collect group research that relies on qualitative approaches, including various methods such as observation, case studies, focus groups, phenomenological approaches, ethnography, discourse and conversation analysis, grounded theory, and others. We encourage a variety of article types, including (but not limited to) Original Researches, Reviews, Hypothesis and Theory, Perspective, Brief Research Reports.
Authors should highlight:
- Perspectives and concepts used to study the group;
- The group’s characteristics, how being in a group gives shape to the phenomena under scrutiny.
Among the phenomena that we would like to cover are the following:
- Decision-making;
- Communication and social interaction;
- Knowledge building and learning;
- Social identity;
- Problem-solving and planning;
- Creativity;
- Therapeutic alliance and change.
Important Note: abstract submission is mandatory for this Research Topic and all abstracts must be submitted before March 15th 2021 to be considered.
Keywords: groups, qualitative methods, constructivist epistemology, emic point of view, naturally occuring phenomena
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.