Organizational Democracy, Organizational Participation, and Employee Ownership: Individual, Organizational and Societal Outcomes

  • 7,944

    Total downloads

  • 46k

    Total views and downloads

Download PDFDownload EPUB

Submit your idea

You will be redirected to our submission process.

Submit your manuscript summarySubmit your manuscript

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Organizational democracy refers to broad‐based, and institutionalized employee participation that is not occasional in nature. Written rules, regulations and boards enable employees to exert influence, at least equal to senior management or employers, on tactical and strategic decisions. This is realized through direct or representative co‐determination or collective self‐determination of the employees (e.g. worker cooperatives, self‐governed firms). Additionally, employees often hold a share of their organization’s equity capital (employee ownership).

Research in organizational participation investigates bodies or initiatives through which employees exert influence on tactical or strategic decisions (e.g. by making proposals) while the senior management has the final say. This can be the case in organizations
• practicing legal co‐determination (e.g., union members in company boards; work councils);
• employing collaborating, self‐managed workgroups;
• practicing deliberative change projects;
• in those social enterprises, which employ core ideas of deliberative democracy; or
• in companies in which employee initiatives collectively are trying to remove grievances and improve their work conditions.

In contrast to research on decision making on the level of the individual job (e.g. job control) or the leadership dyad (e.g. participative goal setting) studies on the effects of democratic decision making or participation on higher levels exist only to a much lesser extent. This desideratum is unsatisfying, for example, because in the wake of the digital transformation of the economy a new potential for organizational democracy and participation is assumed regarding areas of highly qualified knowledge work (catchwords: New work, platform economy, agile methods). Researchers have postulated that organizational participation and democracy would form a socialization field for personality development and societal (or, even, cosmopolitan) responsibility through allowing employees to gather experiences in planning and decision making as well as mutual responsibility‐taking. Such a potential spillover effect is relevant for a humane design of the digital transformation since we live in times of increasing debates about corporate corruption, the global environmental crisis, global inequality, or endangered social cohesiveness.

This Research Topic aims at collecting theoretical contributions, systematic research reviews and quantitative or qualitative empirical studies that help to clarify how organizational democracy, participation or employee ownership are associated with psychological, organizational, or societal outcomes. Reports on longitudinal or process studies are especially welcome.

Interconnected research questions referring to work and decision making in democratic, participative or employee‐owned enterprises or organizational units may deal with, for example
• psychological factors causing retention, regeneration or degeneration of participative or democratic decision structures;
• associations with prosocial behavior, innovativeness or employee solidarity, civic and democratic behaviors or employees’ ethical orientations and moral competencies;
• compatibility with leadership behaviors (e.g. democratic, shared, distributed or ethically forms of leadership);
• associations with organizational conflicts, psychological wellbeing, health and safety (e.g., self-endangering work engagement)

Further, it must be clarified which of the following concepts represent mediators, moderators or outcomes of working in participative contexts
• participative organizational climate and organizational justice;
• employees’ needs for participation and attitudes towards participation;
• satisfaction of employees’ basic psychological needs associated with the development of work motivation and work engagement;
• forms of collective and personal efficacy;
• psychological ownership and meaning in work

Please note: An abstract must be submitted prior to any manuscript, with Topic Editors expecting an abstract of about 300-350 words. The abstract submission deadline is 15th December 2020 and the Topic Editors will inform you their decision by 15th February 2021.
In case of theoretical papers: Short description of the theoretical problem / objective, concerned approaches or discourses, existing research, outline of a new concept, model or propositions
In case of empirical papers: Short description of the research question / main hypotheses, theoretical approach, study design and methodology, results, implications

Keywords: Organizational Democracy, Organizational Participation, Employee Ownership, Individual Outcomes, Organizational Outcomes, Societal Outcomes

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

     

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

     

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

     

Participating Journals

Impact

  • 46kTopic views
  • 34kArticle views
  • 7,944Article downloads
View impact