About this Research Topic
Restorative environment design has been tested on psychological, physiological, and cognitive levels whereas biophilic design draws from the architect's experience and intuition. What evidence do we have of the effectiveness of biophilic design? If biophilic design is based on the biophilia hypothesis, then it requires empirical testing and rigorous analysis of its effects over time for different groups and places (by age, gender, culture, etc.), as restorative environment design. What protocols, what measuring systems can we use to test the effectiveness of biophilic design?
This Research Topic welcomes original research articles and reviews that help clarify the theoretical background, tools, and limits of biophilic design. It will also have original empirical case studies (that is evaluation of the psycho-physical effects) of one or more projects to help clarify the application of biophilic design. In particular, it aims to show the similarities and differences between biophilic and restorative environment design and the contribution that such disciplines as evolutionary biology and environmental psychology can offer to biophilic design.
Image: copyrights are owned by Festoon House Lighting
Keywords: biophilic design, restorative environments, biophilia, investigation methods, attention restoration, stress recovery, connection with nature
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.