
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Vet. Sci., 06 February 2024
Sec. Comparative and Clinical Medicine
Volume 11 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1365518
This article is a correction to:
Non-invasive methods to assess muscle function in dogs: A scoping review
A corrigendum on
Non-invasive methods to assess muscle function in dogs: a scoping review
by Dahl, K. H., Zebis, M. K., Vitger, A. D., Miles, J. E., and Alkjær, T. (2023). Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1116854. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1116854
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. “Electrical impedance myography” was repeated by mistake the square furthest to the right in the second row from the top. This box should have instead read “Subjective evaluation”. The corrected Figure 4 and its caption appear below.
Figure 4. The grading of the identified muscle function assessment methods made by experts in biomechanics (x-axis) and clinical experts (y-axis) in relation to dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. The most optimal techniques are placed closer to the upper right corner, and the least optimal closest to the lower left corner.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: dogs, muscle function, methods, non-invasive, cranial cruciate ligament rupture
Citation: Dahl KH, Zebis MK, Vitger AD, Miles JE and Alkjær T (2024) Corrigendum: Non-invasive methods to assess muscle function in dogs: a scoping review. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1365518. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1365518
Received: 04 January 2024; Accepted: 17 January 2024;
Published: 06 February 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Ali Mobasheri, University of Oulu, Finland
Copyright © 2024 Dahl, Zebis, Vitger, Miles and Alkjær. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kathrine Højte Dahl, a2F0aHJpbmVoZEBzdW5kLmt1LmRr
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.