REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1569372

The environmental sustainability of meat-based versus vegan pet food

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Bryant Research, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Sustainable Pet Food Foundation, London, United Kingdom
  • 3School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • 4School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
  • 5Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Winchester, Winchester, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Rapid climate change is one of humanity's most pressing global challenges, and we must urgently address unsustainable practices in all sectors to mitigate its most devastating effects. The pet food sector is a large and growing global industry that feeds about one billion dogs and cats. Moreover, its production is closely linked to the livestock sector, to which at least 25% of all anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to date are attributable, and probably substantially more. Globally, dogs and cats consume 9% of livestock animals. In the US, this rises to 20%. This review collates and analyses studies on the environmental impacts of pet food, and recommends mitigation strategies. All reviewed studies agree that pet food is associated with at least non-negligible environmental impacts that must be accounted for and addressed: in the US, 25-30% of the environmental impacts of animal production have been attributed to companion animal diets. Studies have estimated a wide range of environmental 'paw prints' for dog and cat diets; in some cases, the environmental impacts of some canine diets compare to or exceed those of human diets. Within pet food, ingredient selection is the most important factor. The most effective measure we can currently take to mitigate these impacts is to transition to non animal-based (vegan) pet food, where this has been formulated to be nutritionally sound. Such a transition could achieve very significant GHG and land use savings. In wealthy nations with high rates of companion animal guardianship, the benefits of this transition are demonstrably equivalent to one quarter to one third of the environmental benefits achievable through human dietary change. A transition to nutritionally sound vegan pet food represents a significant extant climate change mitigation strategy which warrants immediate implementation.

Keywords: Pet food, Environmental Impacts, sustainability, Animal byproducts, vegan, PET, dog, cat

Received: 31 Jan 2025; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nicholles and Knight. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Billy Nicholles, Bryant Research, London, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more