Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1561991

Effect of quinoa flour on fermentation, physicochemical and sensory properties of goat milk yogurt

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Laboratory of Engineering and Applied Technologies, Higher School of Technology, M’ghila Campus, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, BP. 591, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco, Béni-Mellal, Morocco
  • 2 National Institute for Agricultural Research (Morocco), Rabat, Morocco
  • 3 Laboratoires TBC, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, B.P. 83 Lille, France., Lille, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France
  • 4 Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia., Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Goat milk (GM) is highly valued for its rich nutritional content, easy digestibility, and low allergenic potential, making it an excellent alternative in the dairy industry. Quinoa, an Andean pseudo cereal, offers significant nutritional benefits, including high protein, fiber, and antioxidant properties. This study aims to assess the impact of adding quinoa flour (QF) on the fermentation, physicochemical and sensory properties of goat milk yogurt (GMY), addressing a research gap regarding the use of roasted quinoa flour (RoQF) in GMY production .White and red quinoa flours, both roasted and unroasted, were incorporated at 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% in the yogurt. The analysis focused on fermentation time, lactic acid production, pH, macronutrient composition, product stability, and sensory evaluation. The inclusion of 1% quinoa flour (QF) significantly increased the yogurt's macronutrient content (p ≤ 0.05) compared to the control test, where protein content was 4.01 and fat content was 3.94 (g/100g). Protein content increased by 0.1 to 0.17 (g/100g), reaching 4.18; 4.15; 4.15 and 4.11(g/100g) for goat milk yogurt with white quinoa flour (GMYWQF), goat milk yogurt with red quinoa flour (GMYRQF), goat milk yogurt with roasted white quinoa flour (GMYRoWQF) and goat milk yogurt with roasted red quinoa flour (GMYRoRQF), respectively. Similarly, fat content increased by 0.03 to 0.09(g/100g) reaching 3.98, 4.03, 3.97, and 3.98(g/100g) for GMYWQF, GMYRQF, GMYRoWQF, and GMYRoRQF, respectively. These modifications accelerated lactic acid production, effectively lowering the pH and reducing fermentation time to just 4 hours significantly faster than the control test demonstrating enhanced fermentation efficiency.Sensory analysis revealed that QF significantly improved the texture and flavor of the yogurt(p ≤ 0.05), with roasted quinoa flour (RoQF) further significantly enhancing consumer acceptability (p ≤ 0.05), by reducing the strong flavor of GM. Additionally, QF significantly improved yogurt stability, enhancing texture and shelf life(p ≤ 0.05). These findings highlight QF's value in GMY by significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increasing protein content, improving texture, and reducing syneresis. Roasting QF further enhances sensory qualities, minimizing the strong goat flavor and boosting acceptability. These benefits are crucial for optimizing dairy formulations

    Keywords: physicochemical properties, Goat milk, Quinoa flour, Sensory evaluation, Yogurt

    Received: 16 Jan 2025; Accepted: 26 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ajbli, Zine-Eddine, LAARAJ, El Alia, Kaoutar, Bouhrim, Herqash, Shahat Hussein, Benbati, Kzaibe and Boutoial. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Nouhaila Ajbli, Laboratory of Engineering and Applied Technologies, Higher School of Technology, M’ghila Campus, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, BP. 591, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco, Béni-Mellal, Morocco
    Salah LAARAJ, National Institute for Agricultural Research (Morocco), Rabat, Morocco
    Khalid Boutoial, Laboratory of Engineering and Applied Technologies, Higher School of Technology, M’ghila Campus, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, BP. 591, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco, Béni-Mellal, Morocco

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more