![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1543805
This article is part of the Research Topic Sustainable Innovations in Agriculture: Economic Analysis of Climate Smart Practices View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Climate change threatens agricultural sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where rain-fed farming supports millions of livelihoods. While climate-smart agriculture (CSA) offers potential solutions, comprehensive evidence synthesis regarding its adoption patterns and impacts among smallholder maize farmers remains limited. This systematic review of 50 peer-reviewed studies (2003-2023) examines adoption determinants, implementation challenges, and livelihood impacts of CSA practices in SSA. The methodology employed a three-stage screening process across EBSCOhost, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, utilising the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for quality assessment. Our analysis reveals significant regional variations in adoption rates (Eastern Africa 56.7%, Southern Africa 43.2%, Western Africa 38.9%), driven by interlinked institutional and socioeconomic factors. Extension services emerge as a critical determinant, increasing adoption 2.8 times, while secure land tenure improves long-term investment by 60%. Gender disparities persist, with female farmers showing 40-55% adoption rates compared to male farmers' 55-70%, primarily due to structural barriers in resource access. Economic factors significantly influence adoption: high initial costs reduce uptake by 65% among resource-poor farmers, while credit access improves adoption by 45%. Our findings identify critical research gaps, including insufficient long-term impact studies beyond 2-3 years and inadequate analysis of gender-specific constraints. Future research priorities should focus on developing standardised methodologies for ecosystem service valuation, examining indigenous knowledge integration, and conducting comprehensive longitudinal studies on sustained adoption patterns. Policy recommendations emphasise the need for integrated approaches combining institutional support, innovative financing mechanisms, and enhanced market linkages, with particular attention to gender-responsive interventions that address multiple adoption barriers simultaneously.
Keywords: Adoption determinants, agricultural productivity, Climate-smart agriculture, climate change adaptation, Livelihood impacts, Smallholder farmers
Received: 11 Dec 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mnukwa, Mdoda and Mudhara. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Minentle Lwando Mnukwa, Agricultural Economics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.