ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1537141

The impact of livelihood capital on the social integration of relocated households: Mediating effects based on livelihood risk

Provisionally accepted
  • College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The social integration of relocated migrants directly determines the success or failure of poverty alleviation relocation efforts. This paper aims to explore the impact of livelihood capital on the social integration of relocated households and the underlying mechanisms. Based on the sustainable livelihoods framework, the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model, quantile regression model, and mediation analysis are used to investigate the relationships between livelihood capital, livelihood risk, and the social integration of relocated households, using 610 survey responses from relocated poverty alleviation households in China collected in 2024. The results are as follows: (1) Overall, livelihood capital has a significant positive effect on the social integration of relocated households. For every oneunit increase in livelihood capital, the social integration level of relocated households increases by 55.32%. However, as the level of social integration improves, the effect of livelihood capital on social integration gradually diminishes. (2) The livelihood risk of relocated households plays a partial mediating role in the process through which livelihood capital affects social integration. In terms of sub-dimensions, environmental risk, employment risk, and health risk each play a partial mediating role in this process. (3) Further analysis reveals that livelihood capital has a more significant positive effect on the social integration of relocated households in township resettlements, part-time agricultural livelihoods, and female-headed households compared to urban resettlements, non-agricultural households, and male-headed households. Based on these findings, the government should focus on improving the livelihood capital of relocated households in multiple dimensions, design and implement multi-layered risk management strategies, and adopt differentiated policies tailored to the specific circumstances and needs of each group to promote the social integration of relocated households.

Keywords: Social integration, Livelihood capital, Livelihood risk, relocation for poverty alleviation, Mediating effect

Received: 30 Nov 2024; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhao, Tang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Manping Tang, College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more