REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1536850

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Approaches in Soil, Water, and Crop Management for Sustainable Agricultural SystemsView all 8 articles

Review on ecological co-culture from sustainable agriculture perspective: hotspots, evolution and frontiers

Provisionally accepted
  • 1School of Geography and Environmental Science, School of Geography and Environmental Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China
  • 2Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study systematically reviews current research on ecological co-culture models in low-carbon agriculture in China, offering theoretical foundations for future research and strategic insights for promoting sustainable agricultural development. Using the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection for data retrieval and employing CiteSpace software for bibliometric analysis, the study reveals the following key findings: 1) Research is highly concentrated, with approximately 52% of studies focused on the “rice-fish symbiosis” model, while research on the “fruit trees + poultry ecological co-culture” model remains relatively sparse. Although approximately one-third of the literature addresses “low-carbon agriculture,” only 2% of the articles explore the relationship between “ecological co-culture” and “low-carbon agriculture,” with approximately 8% covering “vertical cultivation.” 2) Both domestic and international publications primarily focus on ecology, life sciences, agriculture, and aquaculture, with minimal representation in geographical journals. 3) The CiteSpace analysis of research publications between 2008 and 2023 found that China Agricultural University and the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences were in a leading position in the field of agriculture and life sciences. 4) There are 255 principal authors with 319 cooperative connections, indicating that there are extensive collaboration networks among scholars and significant potential for advancing research on low-carbon agriculture and ecological co-culture models in China. 5) The most prominent keywords from 2014 to 2023 include “rice,” “rice-fish symbiosis,” and “ecological symbiosis.” Additional keywords such as “rural revitalization” and “low-carbon agricultural technology” have attracted considerable attention, with a peak intensity value of 4.8. These results reflect the evolving focus of research on low-carbon agriculture in the post-pandemic era. Over time, research priorities have shifted from vertical farming and paddy-field fish farming to food security under peak carbon and green finance, while international studies have increasingly emphasized on genetic diversity. Through a quantitative review of domestic and international literature, this paper addresses a critical gap in the study of low-carbon ecological co-culture. In conclusion, our findings underscore that research on ecological co-culture models within low-carbon agriculture remains a critical area of focus both domestically and internationally.

Keywords: Low-carbon agriculture, Ecological co-culture, Rice-fish farming, carbon neutrality, Agricultural sustainability Chinese Agricultural History, Aquatic science, Freshwater fishery, Ecological economy

Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Xiaofeng Lin, School of Geography and Environmental Science, School of Geography and Environmental Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more