Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Urban Agriculture

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1533433

A Carbon-Centric Evaluation Framework for Building-Integrated Agriculture: A Comparison of Three Farm Types and Building Standards

Provisionally accepted
Mohamed Imam Mohamed Imam 1*Alesandros Glaros Alesandros Glaros 2Cheney Chen Cheney Chen 1Ajwal Dsouza Ajwal Dsouza 3Amy Brander Amy Brander 1Robert Ferguson Robert Ferguson 4
  • 1 Perkins&Will, Vancouver, Canada
  • 2 University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
  • 3 University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • 4 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This paper explores the potential of Building-Integrated Agriculture (BIA) as a strategy to align urban agriculture systems with building lifecycle sustainability goals. BIA systems such as indoor vertical farms, rooftop greenhouses, and soil-based urban farms promise to bolster urban food security and resource circularity. However, their environmental impacts can be further optimized via integration with building resources and strategic design, which requires a standardized framework for evaluating life-cycle metrics. This study develops a cross-industry Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework that harmonizes agricultural and building performance indicators, using carbon as a unifying metric to evaluate operational and embodied impacts.The research combines a meta-analysis of existing LCA studies, detailed case study evaluations, and novel paired metrics to quantify energy use, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions within a case study. Key findings identify operational carbon hotspots, infrastructure inefficiencies, and embodied carbon challenges while highlighting opportunities for integrating resource recovery strategies, such as greywater reuse and waste heat recovery. The results reveal trade-offs between productivity and environmental impact, with vertical farms demonstrating high yields but significant energy intensity, while soil-based systems excel in resource efficiency but exhibit lower output. This work introduces a structured methodology for cross-industry data integration and offers actionable insights for designers, growers and developers. By redefining system boundaries and incorporating reciprocal benefits between BIA and host buildings, this framework provides a pathway toward more sustainable urban agricultural practices and resilient urban ecosystems.

    Keywords: Building integrated agriculture, Life Cycle Assesment, Urban food security, resource circularity, Operational carbon emission, Embodied carbon

    Received: 24 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Imam, Glaros, Chen, Dsouza, Brander and Ferguson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Mohamed Imam, Perkins&Will, Vancouver, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more