The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems
Volume 9 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1500012
Characterizing Avocado Production Systems for Export in Uganda: The Need for Consolidation and Support for Sustainable Development
Provisionally accepted- 1 Gittands Agro Limited, Kampala, Uganda
- 2 COmmittee Linking Entrepreneurship – Agriculture – Development (COLEAD), Brussels, Belgium
- 3 Avocado Association of Uganda, Kampala, Uganda
- 4 National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), Kampala, Uganda
- 5 Eprod Solutions LtD, Nairobi, Kenya
Hass avocado production and trade are rapidly expanding globally, with increasing consumer demands on quality, safety and sustainability. Last decade, the contribution of East Africa has increased tremendously following several comparative advantages. However, despite substantial recent public and private investments, Uganda's Hass production and export lags behind neighboring countries. This is mainly due to the sector's limited organization, resulting in a fragmented market with varying socio-economic, environmental, and agronomic conditions. Consequently, the limited data and insights on these variable production systems negatively impact the effectiveness of interventions and investments in the sector. In this study, Hass avocado producers were randomly selected across Uganda. Field visits included farm & field surveys, GPS mapping of production areas, and soil sampling for wet-chemistry analysis. Descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression, and ANOVA were used to assess the impact of farm and field characteristics on production practices and access to advisory services and certification. Farming systems and dynamics were characterized by assessing demographics, economic data, marketing, farmer organization, and farming practices including soil and nutrient management, irrigation, pest and disease control, and post-harvest management. Results show a fragmented and immature but expanding Hass sector in Uganda. Production mostly occurs in small- to medium-sized fields with no or limited inputs (i.e. fertilisers, pesticides, irrigation), using manual labour (family or hired) under mixed cropping systems, but lacking critical infrastructure, agronomic knowledge, extension services, and access to markets. In contrast to farmer’s belief that soils are suitable and fertile for Hass avocado, soil analyses indicate the urgent need for site specific soil management interventions. Implementation of good agronomic practices and access to inputs and advisory services seem mostly related to farm and field size, and to a lesser extent influenced by farmer age, orchard age, and agroecology, while membership of farmer organisations/associations currently seem to bring limited benefits. This study highlights several comparative advantages and opportunities for the Hass sector in Uganda and identifies the priority challenges to be tackled in future investments and interventions targeting a sustainable avocado industry.
Keywords: Avocado, Hass, export, small & medium sized producers, sustainable production, Farming system analysis, sector organisation, markets
Received: 22 Sep 2024; Accepted: 15 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sseruwagi, Lehmann, Sigombe, Ddamulira, Van Casteren and De Bauw. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Pieterjan De Bauw, COmmittee Linking Entrepreneurship – Agriculture – Development (COLEAD), Brussels, Belgium
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.