
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1491760
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Understanding the livelihood strategy choices and influencing factors of farmers in the area of GGP is conducive to improving the livelihood level of farmers in the area and promoting the quality and efficiency of the project. For this study, we combine the characteristics of farmers in the area of GGP, constructs a livelihood evaluation index system for farmers, and uses a binary logistic model to explore the influencing factors of farmers' livelihood strategy choices. The research found: (1) The livelihood capital of farmers is ranked from high to low as part-time agricultural type (0.183), nonagricultural type (0.174), and pure agricultural type (0.126). ( 2) The stability level of farmers' livelihoods is ranked from high to low as part-time agricultural type (0.607), non-agricultural type (0.519), and pure agricultural type (0.409). (3) The impact of livelihood capital on the livelihood strategy choices of different types of farmers varies significantly. The quality of economic forest site and the health status of the head of household is positively affecting the part-time agricultural type, negatively affecting pure agricultural type; Productive assets are positively affecting pure agricultural type, negatively acting on non-agricultural type, while labor is opposite. It is recommended that the government needs to pay attention to changes in farmers livelihoods after the expiration of the subsidy for GGP, and develop differentiated livelihood level improvement policies based on the characteristics of farmers' livelihood capital.
Keywords: Grain for Green Project, Livelihood capital, Livelihood stability, Livelihood strategy choices, Influencing factors
Received: 05 Sep 2024; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ling, Yin, Hu and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jiayun Dong, College of Economics and Managerment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.