Skip to main content

CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Urban Agriculture

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1410324

This article is part of the Research Topic Sustainable Food Networks: Chains of Values and Food Transitions View all 9 articles

Urbanizing Food Systems: Exploring the Interactions of Food Access Dimensions for Sustainability

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States
  • 2 The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • 3 Coppin State University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This paper aims to conceptualize the dimensions of food access to enhance urban food system sustainability by analyzing the cause-effect interactions between the five dimensions and the urban food environment and using spider web diagrams to illustrate their interrelationships in terms of community perception and objectivity. Various studies have conceptualized access as a construct of five dimensions. This new expanded view supports both objective and perceived aspects of access and values the knowledge of residents through community-based participatory research, thereby providing a more complete understanding of access. This study, building on Usher's broader themes of spatiality, objectivity and perception, analyzes the cause-effect interactions between the five dimensions and the urbanizing food environment by expanding and modeling the dimensions of access and their interactions critical to the analysis and decisionmaking processes of sustainable urbanizing food systems. With the use of spider web diagrams, we demonstrate the degree of interactions among the five dimensions (availability, accessibility, acceptability, accommodation, availability, and affordability), with respect to the community perception and objectivity. We used the DPSIR causal framework to analyze the cause-effect relations between the five dimensions and the DPSIR components: drivers, pressures, state, impact, and response. The five dimensions are further conceptualized for spiderweb and DPSIR for low, medium and high interactivity. The conceptualizations are applied to three case studies from the literature. This paper, additionally, integrates insights from Systems Thinking, which has been pivotal in understanding the complex, interconnected nature of sustainable food systems. Furthermore, ecosystem approaches to health, which emphasize systemic and holistic perspectives, are also considered. These approaches highlight the interdependence between ecological and human health, advocating for integrated strategies that promote both environmental and human well-being.

    Keywords: Food access, Food security, Driving Force, Pressure, State, Impacts, Response, Perception, Objectivity, five dimensions of access

    Received: 31 Mar 2024; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Anandhi, Usher, Schulterbrandt Gragg III, Ph.D. and Jiru. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Kareem M Usher, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210, Ohio, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more