Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Crop Biology and Sustainability
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1467201

Effect of Summer Legume Residue Incorporation and Fertilizer Regimes on Rice Growth, Yield, and Nutrient Uptake

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Agronomy, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India
  • 2 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, Indonesia
  • 3 Division of Genetics and Plant breeding, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
  • 4 Division of Agricultural Engineering, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India
  • 5 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, India
  • 6 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, King Khalid University, Assir, Saudi Arabia
  • 7 Agricultural Research Center (Egypt), Giza, Giza, Egypt
  • 8 Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
  • 9 Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura universiy, Mansoura, Egypt

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In a field trial at the College Farm, NAU, Navsari (Gujarat), evaluated four main plot treatments (T1: Green gram, T2: Cowpea, T3: Dhaincha, and T4: Fallow), which were grown during the summer with three replications following a randomized block design (RCBD).Green gram and cowpea were incorporated into the soil after harvest, but dhaincha was incorporated at 50% flowering. During Kharif, each main plot was split into six smaller plots with different treatments: W1 was 100% RDF, W2 was 75% RDF, W3 was 50% RDF, W4 was 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM, W5 was 50% RDF + 50% N from FYM, and W6 was no fertilizer. The results of all 24 treatment combinations were repeated three times in a split-plot design. The analysis showed significant growth, yield attributes, grain yield, and straw yield of rice in dhaincha-incorporated plots (T3), fb greengram (T1), and cowpea (T2) plots using 100% RDF, while fallow (T4) with no fertilizer application recorded significantly lower values. SPAD meter readings of rice were higher in W4 (75% RDF + 25% N from FYM), which was at par with W1 in dhaincha-incorporated plots (75% RDF + 25% N from FYM) (W4). However, applying no fertilizer (W6) resulted in lower values. The total uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus in rice was highest when it was grown in dhaincha incorporated (T3), followed by green gram (T1), cowpea (T2) incorporated plots with the usage of 100% RDF (W1) and 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM (W4), and lower values were recorded in fallow + no fertilizer treatment (T4W6). Our study revealed that incorporating summer legumes before planting rice significantly increased plant height, tillers, grain and straw yield, and total uptake. With dhaincha, inclusion has shown a greater advantage.

    Keywords: Summer legumes, rice, yield, Growth attributes, Nitrogen, Phosphorus

    Received: 22 Jul 2024; Accepted: 04 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Sunil Kumar, Virdia, Patel, Ragi, Chowdhury, Kumar, Elbagory, Omara, Salem and Elbeltagi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Manojit Chowdhury, Division of Agricultural Engineering, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, 110012, India
    Ali Salem, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.