Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1464609
This article is part of the Research Topic Increasing Resilience through Multi-Species Intercropping, Agroforestry and Mixed Grazing Crop-Livestock Systems View all 9 articles

Effects of canopy management of umbrella tree (Terminalia brownii Fres.) on microclimate and maize (Zea mays L.) yield in agroforestry parkland of South Ari District, Southern Ethiopia

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
  • 2 Southern Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Awasa, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region, Ethiopia
  • 3 Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
  • 4 Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute (EBI), Addis Ababa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Traditionally, some smallholder farmers in the South Ari District of southern Ethiopia retain natural forest remnant trees on their crop fields, and they manage them through pruning and pollarding techniques. Among these, the umbrella tree (Terminalia brownii) is one of the most preferred and dominant species, with numerous multipurpose uses. However, the effects of canopy management on microclimate and crop yield have not yet been investigated. Here, we present the effects of Terminalia brownii canopy management on microclimate and maize yield in agroforestry parkland. Microclimate and maize yield data from three radial distances from the tree trunks to the open field: D1 (0–4.1 m), D2 (4.1–8.2 m), and D3 (>15 m outside the tree canopy cover) were collected. Three tree canopy management treatments (pollarding, pruning, and control) were considered and replicated three times in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) for applying canopy management treatments. Our results revealed that the canopy management of the tree affected the microclimate, which in turn influenced maize yield. In all treatments, there were statistically significant differences (P<0.05) observed in maize yield and yield components under tree canopy and open fields of both canopy-managed trees and control. The mean highest grain yields were observed in plots with pruned (3,717 kg ha-1) and pollarded (3,718 kg ha-1) trees, while the lowest yield (2,146 kg ha-1) was obtained from the control plot. The observed differences in yield might be due to a higher accumulation of soil nutrients, modified microclimate under the tree canopy, and reduced shading effects via canopy management. Therefore, we conclude that either pruning or pollarding of Terminalia brownii enhances maize yield by modifying microclimate and improving soil nutrients. Pruning, in particular, offers a balance of shade and light, creating a stable microclimate with consistent seasonal light and reduced temperature fluctuations, which supports better maize growth in agroforestry systems.

    Keywords: crop productivity, open field, pruning, Pollarding, Tree-crop interaction, Shading effects

    Received: 14 Jul 2024; Accepted: 26 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Handiso, Asfaw, Glaser, Bromm, Gross and Lemma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Mitiku Ayele Handiso, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
    Bruno Glaser, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.