Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1460734
This article is part of the Research Topic Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Food Production Systems View all 15 articles

Wheat Performance and Nitrogen Use Efficiency under No-Till in Uruguay: A Comparison of Crop-Pasture and Continuous Cropping Systems

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Soil and Water, Faculty of Agronomy, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • 2 Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agronomy, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • 3 Departamento de Biometría, Estadística y Computación,Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The shift in Uruguayan agriculture to no-till farming and more intensive agricultural practices, moving from crop-pasture (CP) systems to continuous cropping (CC) rotations, has disrupted biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). However, this change has not reduced the soil organic carbon (SOC) balance under no-till management under diversified cropping sequences that include C4 species, so the impact of this conversion on productivity and sustainability has yet to be noticeable insignificant across the system as a whole. This study, conducted within a long-term experiment (LTE), compared wheat productivity under no-till crop conditions for two systems: the first crop seeded after the perennial pasture phase in CP rotation and wheat in continuous annual cropping (CC rotation) in a rainfed environment. The variables measured were included soil nitrogen (N) concentration, wheat grain yield (WGY), grain protein concentration (GPC), and N use efficiency (NUE) by wheat over three seasons. The experimental treatments included four N fertilizer levels evaluated at each rotation system. The comparison between the two rotation systems revealed that CC consistently outperformed CP in terms of WGY, with an average of 2425 vs. 1668 kg ha -1 . Grain PC varied between rotations and N rates, with CP generally showing a higher GPC (on average, 10.48 vs. 10.92 %). Nitrate-N levels at tillering correlated positively with WGY and negatively with GPC, but the relationship differed by rotation. Soil NUE indices varied between rotations, with CC generally showing higher efficiencies. The study's findings highlighted the potential of CC rotation, especially when including C4 species in the crop sequence, to achieve higher wheat productivity in the short term due to healthier soil conditions compared to than the succeeding wheat seeded after post-pasture in CP. In conclusion Additionally, our study highlights that the effect of the previous crop on yield and NUE by in wheat was more relevant than the expected residual effect of the pasture phase in CP, mainly driven by primarily due to the quality of residues and the temporary adverse effects of soil compaction caused by livestock trampling.

    Keywords: Wheat productivity, N use efficiency, Soil N dynamic, No-till systems, Residues quality

    Received: 07 Jul 2024; Accepted: 06 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Alvez, Benech, Barrios and Varela. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Cristina Mori Alvez, Department of Soil and Water, Faculty of Agronomy, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.