Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1452779
This article is part of the Research Topic On-Farm Implementation of Transformative Technologies and Practices for Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture View all 4 articles

Strip cropping increases yield and revenue: multi-year analysis of an organic system in the Netherlands

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Farming systems ecology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • 2 Field Crops Research, Wageningen University and Research, Lelystad, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Intercropping is proposed as a promising strategy to meet future food demand while reducing agriculture's environmental impact by re-diversifying agricultural fields. Strip cropping, a form of intercropping, has a potential to simultaneously deliver multiple ecosystem services including productivity, while facilitating management as strip width can be adjusted to the working width of available machines. While the yield performance of strip cropping systems is influenced by the interaction between neighboring crops, to date, empirical studies on the performance of various crop combinations in strip cropping systems are limited. Here we used three-year data (2020-2022) from a 64-ha organic strip cropping system in the Netherlands to 1) evaluate the effects of crop neighbors and strip cropping on yield and 2) explore if optimizing the allocation of crop neighbors in alternative strip cropping configurations can improve yield and revenue performances. We analyzed the edge effect and strip cropping effect on yield of six crops grown in strips, each neighboring a total of five crops. The yield data was then used to evaluate the performance of the current and alternative strip configurations in terms of LER and relative revenue. Results showed that except for the positive effect observed on potato when neighboring celeriac or broccoli, edge effects lacked statistical significance. Strip cropping effect varied per crop: positive for faba bean and parsnip, neutral for celeriac and potato, and negative for oat and onion. Analysis across crops showed an overall significant positive strip cropping effect on yield. These findings highlighted the value of analysis at the cropping system level in developing designs aimed at unlocking the potential of strip cropping. The positive but variable strip cropping effects observed in the current experimental design and the two alternative configurations suggests prioritizing an overall increased crop diversity over optimizing their spatial arrangement. While we demonstrated increased productivity with strip cropping, further research is needed to expand the database on optimal crop combinations, extending the evaluation beyond yield and revenue performances to facilitate broader adoption of strip cropping in the Netherlands and Western Europe.

    Keywords: intercropping, Diversified cropping systems, crops combinations, Land equivalent ratio (LER), relative revenue

    Received: 21 Jun 2024; Accepted: 15 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Juventia and van Apeldoorn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Stella Dimitri Juventia, Farming systems ecology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.