Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agricultural and Food Economics
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1449684
This article is part of the Research Topic Strategies Of Digitalization And Sustainability In Agrifood Value Chains View all 22 articles

Transparency and changing stakeholder roles in the digital age of sustainable agri-food supply chain networks

Provisionally accepted
  • Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Society and policy demand greater food system sustainability, driving practitioners to increase supply chain network transparency through digital innovation. Uncertainties regarding the structuring of relationships with primary and secondary stakeholders for sharing intangible data and information diminishes the potential for exploitation of digital transparency. While businesses are accustomed to organizing efficient flows of tangible goods, management research integrating digital transparency considerations to investigate and conceptualize structural changes in agri-food supply chain networks is scarce. This gap motivates the following four questions of this study: (1) Who are the primary and secondary stakeholders in the agri-food supply chain networks of the digital era? (2) What are their transparency interests? (3) How do agri-food supply chain network structures change with the emergence of digital innovations that can facilitate sustainability transition through greater transparency? (4) How to conceptualize those structural changes to agri-food supply chain networks? The netchain approach and respective transparency concept is integrated with classical stakeholder theory. Data was collected via a series of 21 semi-structured pilot interviews with technology providers in the EU agri-food sector and analysed using structured content analysis. Results paint a complex picture of contemporary primary and secondary stakeholders of agri-food supply chain networks and their interests. Primary stakeholder interests lead to coopetition in vertical and horizontal relationships of the netchain and low transparency efforts by intermediaries. Both hamper the dissemination of digital innovations and the exploitation of their potential to improve agri-food supply chain network sustainability. Among secondary stakeholders, policy makers and governments, NGOs, and technology providers excel in being drivers of digital transparency for sustainability, with social media as a strong direct communication tool to reach netchain stakeholders, consumers, and research institutes/universities as collaborators and customers. The emergence of ‘Information AFSCN’ and ‘Digital AFSCN’ increases the complexity of the whole supply chain network through intermediation, reconfiguration and emergence modes of change to underlying structures. Agri-food business managers, scientists and policy makers should innovate in private and public governance to facilitate collaborative advantage and sustainability in a combination aligned with innovative digital transparency solutions.

    Keywords: Sustainability1, digitalization2, netchain3, stakeholder theory4, coopetition5, organizational structure6, governance7, technology provider8

    Received: 15 Jun 2024; Accepted: 30 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Otter and Robinson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Verena Otter, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.