Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Aquatic Foods
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1445760

Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three GnRH Analogues in Induced Breeding of Stinging Catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis Under Hatchery Conditions

Provisionally accepted
Rahima Yasmin Rahima Yasmin 1Md. Mofizur Rahman Md. Mofizur Rahman 1Smriti Chakrabarty Smriti Chakrabarty 1Bhakta Supratim Sarker Bhakta Supratim Sarker 1Md. Maheen Mahmud Bappy Md. Maheen Mahmud Bappy 1Pallab Sarker Pallab Sarker 2*Mohammed Albeshr Mohammed Albeshr 3Takaomi Arai Takaomi Arai 4M. Belal Hossain M. Belal Hossain 5*
  • 1 Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh
  • 2 University of California, Santacruz, California, USA, California, United States
  • 3 King Saud University, Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 4 Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei-Muara, Brunei
  • 5 Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Evaluating the breeding performance of cultivable fish using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues is crucial for optimizing reproductive efficiency and enhancing the sustainability of aquaculture practices. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding which GnRH analogue performs best under hatchery conditions for stinging catfish. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the breeding performance of stinging catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis) using three commercially available GnRH analogues: Wova-FH, Ovaprim, and Easy-spawn. For this purpose, an experiment was set up in a commercial hatchery by dividing the samples into three groups, each treated with one of the analogues: Wova-FH, Ovaprim, or Easy-spawn. In the experiment, a ratio of 1.5:1 male to female was maintained, and 1 ml syringes were used to inject the analogues. The results showed that the spawning induction efficiency differed among the three inducing agents. Compared to Ovaprim and Easy-spawn, Wova-FH-treated H. fossilis exhibited higher breeding success in all measured aspects. Specifically, Wova-FH achieved a latency period of 8 hours, an ovulation rate of 87.25%, a fertilization rate of 89.33%, a hatching rate of 88.85%, and an incubation period of 16 hours. In comparison, Ovaprim and Easy-spawn had incubation periods of 18 hours and 24 hours, respectively. In Ovaprim-induced individuals, the latency period was approximately 8.30 hours, with an ovulation rate of 82.08%, a fertilization rate of 86.75%, and a hatching rate of 85.97%. In contrast, the Easy-spawn-induced individuals had a latency period of 9 hours, an ovulation rate of 27.50%, a fertilization rate of 27.10%, and a hatching rate of 26.15%. Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed among the treatments in both the ovulation rate, fertilization rate, latency period incubation period, and hatching rate. The findings suggest that Wova-FH is a superior alternative to Ovaprim and Easy-spawn for GnRH analogues in the induced breeding programs of H. fossilis, offering optimal yield.

    Keywords: Stinging catfish, GnRH hormones, Induced breeding, sustainable aquaculture, performance

    Received: 08 Jun 2024; Accepted: 30 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Yasmin, Rahman, Chakrabarty, Sarker, Bappy, Sarker, Albeshr, Arai and Hossain. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Pallab Sarker, University of California, Santacruz, California, USA, California, United States
    M. Belal Hossain, Griffith University, Nathan, 4111, Queensland, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.