Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1441295

Multi-environment performance analysis (MEPA) identifies more productive and widely adapted chicken breeds for smallholder farmers

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 International Livestock Research Institute (Ethiopia), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • 2 Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • 3 AL Rae Centre for Genetics and Breeding, Massey University, Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, New Zealand

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Smallholder chicken production system is dominant in tropical developing countries and it contributes significantly to the livelihoods of farmers. Performance of flocks is often too low to meet growing demands for meat and eggs. Unavailability of productive and adaptive breeds and that match suitably with the environment is a major limitation. Breeds developed for low-or medium-input systems elsewhere can be evaluated for their performances and introduced at scale to enhance productivity and improve socioeconomic outcomes. Such genetic interventions require conducting multi-environment performance analysis (MEPA) of candidate breeds. However, analytical frameworks and methods are not readily available to identify the best performing breeds considering agroecological differences. Methods used in plant breeding to predict productivity and yield stability of genotypes across environments are theoretically applicable to smallholder livestock systems. In the present study, we adapted two modelling approaches of MEPA to evaluate growth performance of chicken breeds across different agroecologies in Ethiopia.Contrary to the conventional classification system that relies on the types of plants grown and other agronomic variables to delineate agroecological classes, we utilized classes defined by Species Distribution Models (SDMs). SDM defined agroecologies take into account the most relevant environmental predictors that influence suitability of habitats for a livestock species and are ideal for breed performance evaluations. Additive main effects multiplicative interaction model (AMMI) and linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were fitted on three agroecologies and five improved chicken breeds to evaluate growth performance until 180-days-of-age (W180) and yield stability (environmental sensitivity). A total of 21,562 chickens were evaluated in 21,5457 smallholder flocks. Our results show that LMM had the best model fit on productivity and yield stability. In both methods of MEPA, Sasso and Kuroiler dual-purpose commercial hybrid chickens were the most productive breeds for W180. Indexes based on LMM consistently identified these two breeds also as the most yield stable. Our results demonstrate that the existing methods of MEPA that are being used in plant breeding are applicable to breed performance comparisons and prediction of genotype by environment interactions (GxE). Moreover, the present study validated that SDM-defined agroecologies are useful for undertaking MEPA in smallholder livestock systems.

    Keywords: Smallholder systems, agroecology, mixed-effects models, AMMI models, Improved breeds, Yield stability, Growth, genotype by environment interactions (GxE)

    Received: 30 May 2024; Accepted: 22 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kebede, Komen, Alemayehu, Hanotte, Kemp, Alemu and Bastiaansen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Fasil Getachew Kebede, International Livestock Research Institute (Ethiopia), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.