The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems
Volume 8 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1429171
This article is part of the Research Topic Fermented-Based Foods As Sustainable Alternative Sources To Meet Future Demand For Protein View all 8 articles
Deployment of power-to-protein technology in Ethiopia to provide drought-related emergency relief and mitigate food insecurity
Provisionally accepted- 1 Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 2 Sustainable Food Systems Engineering Group, Department of Food Science & Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States
- 3 Environmental Biotechnology Group, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- 4 Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max Planck Society, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- 5 The Novo Nordisk Foundation CO2 Research Center (CORC), Aarhus University, Aahrus, Denmark
- 6 Cluster of Excellence - Controlling Microbes to Fight Infections, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 7 New Materials Institute, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
- 8 Institute for Integrative Precision Agriculture, University of Georgia, Athens, United States
Food insecurity in Ethiopia is an immediate humanitarian crisis that is expected to worsen due to population growth and climate change. This study applied GIS-based approaches to evaluate the feasibility of deploying an emergent type of single-cell protein (SCP) technology to supplement the nutritional needs of Ethiopian citizens who are most vulnerable to drought. The technologypowerto-protein (PtP)uses H2 and O2 from water electrolysis and CO2 from woody biomass combustion in a two-stage bioprocess to produce nutrient-rich protein powder for human consumption. Population density, land use, and other geographical data were used to identify optimal site locations for these PtP systems based on two deployment strategies: large centralized plants vs. small decentralized units. The model also accounted for biomass availability, collection, and distribution logistics. The analysis revealed three sites that are both (highly) vulnerable/food-insecure and accessible within walking distance. The identified sites are proximate to the urban areas of Mekele in northern Ethiopia, Addis Ababa in central Ethiopia, and Hawasa south of Addis Ababa. If centralized PtP were deployed, the protein requirements of these populations could be sustained for several months, assuming a modest biomass collection radius of 35 km. Decentralized PtP deployment was similarly effective, requiring a distribution density of 5.4 -11.0 PtP units per km 2 under conservative estimates and 0.76 -1.1 units per km 2 under optimistic estimates. Lastly, a theoretical comparison showed that PtP is more efficient than conventional agricultural food production regarding biomassto-protein conversion yields. Overall, our study suggests that PtP technology would be a feasible approach to supplement the nutritional needs of Ethiopian people in times of drought-related emergencies. However, given logistical limitations and considering social preference factors, it would be more practical to implement PtP in conjunction with standard emergency food aid measures.
Keywords: Food crisis, Single-cell protein, extreme weather, Sustainable food production, Disaster relief, microbial protein
Received: 07 May 2024; Accepted: 13 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Buchner, Nguyen, Angenent, Zarfl and Usack. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Joseph G. Usack, Sustainable Food Systems Engineering Group, Department of Food Science & Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.