Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Climate-Smart Food Systems
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1414243
This article is part of the Research Topic Transforming African Food Systems View all articles

The role of sustainable land management practices in alleviating household food insecurity in Nigeria

Provisionally accepted
F A. Kitole F A. Kitole 1J K. Sesabo J K. Sesabo 1O F. Adesiyan O F. Adesiyan 2A O. Ige A O. Ige 2Temitope Oluwaseun O. Ojo Temitope Oluwaseun O. Ojo 2*C U. Emenike C U. Emenike 3H S. Kassem H S. Kassem 4K M. Elhindi K M. Elhindi 5
  • 1 Mzumbe University, Morogoro, Tanzania
  • 2 Obafemi Awolowo University, Ife, Nigeria
  • 3 Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • 4 Mansoura University, Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt
  • 5 King Saud University, Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Climate change is a major challenge impacting food security globally. sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries including Nigeria has experienced the negative effect of climate vagaries most especially on agricultural production, thus, leading to food insecurity. However, sustainable land management (SLM) practices have a huge potential to minimize the impacts on food security in a rapidly changing climate. This study estimates the determinants of the adoption of SLM practices and the impact of adoption on household food security among smallholder rice farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria. A multistage sampling procedure was used to select 120 respondents. A Poisson endogenous treatment (PET) model was employed to analyse the determinants of level of adoption of SLM and impact of SLM adoption on household food security level of smallholder rice farmers in the study area. To account for counterfactuals, a doubly-robust augmented-probability-weighted regression adjustment (APWRA) was also used. In the same vein, the study employed the marginal treatment effects (MTE) approach to estimate the treatment effects heterogeneity. The results showed that socio-economic factors greatly influenced the adoption of SLM practices, such as age and educational level of farmers. The effect of SLM adoption on food security of smallholder farmers was found to be improved when they used SLM package consisting of variety of practices, hence, SLM practices have the potential to alleviate food insecurity among rice farmers if well combined and used to a large extent. The study concluded that knowledge in form of formal education, some form of vocational training, and trainings to access weather information were key to influencing SLM adoption among smallholder farmers in the study area. Farm level policy efforts that aims to equip farmers through education, trainings and disseminating information on climate change would be a huge step towards the promotion of SLM practice which eventually leads to increased food security. The study recommended that continuous adoption and extensive use can be fostered by encouraging farmers to join a social organisation where related and relevant information on sustainable land management practices is shared through trained agricultural extension officers.

    Keywords: poisson endogenous treatment, Food security, rice farming, Marginal treatment effects, Sustainable land management practice

    Received: 08 Apr 2024; Accepted: 10 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kitole, Sesabo, Adesiyan, Ige, Ojo, Emenike, Kassem and Elhindi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Temitope Oluwaseun O. Ojo, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ife, Nigeria

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.