Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1412198
This article is part of the Research Topic Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Food Production Systems View all 12 articles

Influence of soil types and agricultural management practices on soil chemical properties and microbial dynamics

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (ICAR), Karnāl, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • 2 Indian Institute of Maize Research, Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (ICAR), Ludhiana, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Soil provides essential nutrients for plant growth, but excess salts hinder development, making crops more vulnerable under climate change conditions. Soil microorganisms play a significant role in nutrient cycling. However, limited information is available on microbial behavior/community changes and functional diversity in different soil types (normal, sodic and highly sodic) and cropping systems [rice-wheat (RW); rice-wheat-mungbean (RWMb); maize-wheat-mungbean (MWMb)] and management practices in the north-western Indo-Gangetic plains of India. We investigated the influence of different soil types on physical and chemical properties at the surface level (0-15 cm) in relation to soil microbial population, activities, and functional diversity, focusing on community-level physiological profiling (CLPP) under different agriculture systems. Seven treatment combinations of soil types, cropping systems and management practices were evaluated. Soil pHs was found to be lower in zero-till (ZT) based sodic soil compared to conventional-till (CT) sodic soil. Soil organic carbon (SOC) (0.91 and 0.90%) content and available N (154.46 and 132.74 kg ha -1 ) were higher with ZT-based system under normal (N) soils (ZT-RWMb-N and ZT-MWMb-N) than in CT-based normal soil (0.67 and 121.04 kg ha -1 ). Similarly, higher SOC and N (0.85 and 76.11 kg ha -1 ) were found under ZT management in sodic soils (S) compared to CT management (0.73% and 121.05 kg ha -1 ). Substrate utilization (amino acids, amines, carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, phenolic compounds, and polymers) increased with the incubation period. During 0-120 h of incubation, the highest utilization of amino acids, amines, carboxylic acids, phenolic compounds, and polymers was observed for ZT-MWMb-S soils, while the lowest was recorded for ZT-MWMb-N soils.Under high salt conditions, soil enzymatic activities (dehydrogenase, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase etc.) declined significantly compared to normal soils, affecting soil chemical and physical conditions. Microbial population and enzyme activities decreased with increasing salt stress across all cropping systems. These findings suggest that adopting efficient crop management practices can help mitigate the adverse effects of soil salinity on microbial diversity and soil health, thereby enhancing sustainable agricultural productivity in salt-affected regions.

    Keywords: Crop management practices, enzymatic activities, microbial community, Salt affected soils, Soil health, sustainable agriculture

    Received: 04 Apr 2024; Accepted: 15 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Choudhary, POONIA, Kakraliya, Dixit and Jat. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Madhu Choudhary, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (ICAR), Karnāl, Himachal Pradesh, India

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.