Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Crop Biology and Sustainability
Volume 8 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1388916
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Solutions For Next-Generation Fertilizers View all 8 articles

Polyhalite improves growth, yield, and quality and reduces insect pest inci-dence in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) in the semiarid tropics

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
  • 2 International Potash Institute (IPI), Industriestrasse, Switzerland
  • 3 Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China
  • 4 College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 5 Taif University, Ta'if, Saudi Arabia
  • 6 College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
  • 7 Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Dinajpur, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In semiarid tropical locations, polyhalite (K2Ca2Mg(SO4)4H2O) and muriate potash (KCl) were tested for their ability to increase cane growth, yield and recovery at potash (K)– and calcium (Ca)–deficient sites. The treatments involved control plots with no potash fertilizer (T1); T2 and T3 applied potassium through (muriate potash) MOP only at 80 and 120 kg K2O ha–1, whereas T4 and T5 applied potassium with half of MOP and polyhalite at 80 and 120 kg K2O ha–1, respectively. At 35 days after harvest (DAH), T2 (10.82%), T3 (24.1%), T4 (34.9%), and T5 (34.9%) had greater ratoon resprouting rate than did the control treatment where it was just 37.0 out of 100 harvested canes. At 308 DAH, T2 (–5.9%), T3 (–5.7%), and T5 (–6.6%) presented greater leaf chlorophyll contents than did T1. The K–fertilized plots yielded 64.31 t ha–1 in T2 and 65.97 t ha–1 in T5, whereas the control plot yielded 61.5 t ha–1. Compared with the control plots, the T5 plots experienced fewer stalk borer (–28.6%), top borer (–23.3%), and early shoot borer (–23.3%) attacks. T2, T4, and T5 presented higher percentages of commercial cane sugar (CCS) (6.82, 8.83, and 8.74%, respectively) than did the control plots. T1 and T3 had similar CCSs (10.99 and 11.33%, respectively). The CCS weight per area ranged from 7.98 to 8.47 t ha–1 near maturity. T4 (8.59 t ha–1) and T5 (8.60 t ha–1) had significantly greater values than did T1–T3. Compared with the control, the applied potassium fertilizer increased the economic output by 8,711, 11,687, 13,485, and 13,857 INR ha–1 in the T2, T3, T4, and T5 plots, respectively. The high-er cost of polyhalite than MOP has reduced its economic advantages. Thus, the T4 plots outperformed the other treatments in terms of growth, yield, and quality indices, but their higher values (120 kg K2O ha–1) were statistically equivalent. Finally, the study concluded that MOP and polyhalite at a 50% ra-tio @ 80 kg K2O ha–1 may help improve sugarcane growth, yield, and quality in semiarid tropical lo-cations.

    Keywords: Polyhalite, sugarcane, productivity, quality, Insect pest

    Received: 20 Feb 2024; Accepted: 15 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Bhatt, Imas, Perelman, Verma, Al-Shuraym, Sayed, Gaber and Hossain. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Rajan Bhatt, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
    Akbar Hossain, Department of Soil Science, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute (BWMRI), Dinajpur, 5200, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.