The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services
Volume 8 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1259607
This article is part of the Research Topic Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Food Production Systems View all 14 articles
Residue retention and precision nitrogen management effects on soil physicochemical properties and productivity of maize-wheat-mungbean system in Indo-Gangetic Plains
Provisionally accepted- 1 Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India
- 2 Indian Institute of Maize Research, Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (ICAR), Ludhiana, Punjab, India
- 3 Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
- 4 Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
- 5 Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India
- 6 Division of Agricultural Physics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
- 7 Indian Institute of Soil Science (ICAR), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
- 8 Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
- 9 National Agro Foundation (NAF), Chennai, India
- 10 Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB), Chennai, India
- 11 National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (ICAR), Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Maize-based crop systems are promoted in large scale in South Asia because they are more sustainable and efficient than rice-based systems. In the present study, using two combinations of crop residue management practices (CRM) with four precision nitrogen (N) management (PNM) systems, we assessed the impacts on soil physicochemical characteristics [soil organic carbon (SOC), bulk density (BD), soil penetration resistance (PR)] and crop yields in six years old continuous zero tillage (ZT) practices under maize-wheat-mungbean cropping system in a sandy loam soil of northwestern India.The highest SOC (5.73 g/kg) was observed in Zero Tillage with Residue Retention (ZT+R) plots. Zerotillage with residue retention (ZT+R) significantly reduced the bulk density over the zero-tillage with no residue retention (ZT-R) across the soil depth. The bulk density in ZT+R was 6.5 and 10.7% lower at 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil depth, respectively, than under ZT-R. The penetration resistance (PR) was significantly lower in ZT+R than in ZT-R across the soil depth. Soil organic carbon (SOC) in ZT+R was 7.4% higher at 0-15cm depth and 11.9% higher at 15-30cm depth than under ZT-R treatment. Among PNM treatments, the sequence of treatments in SOC content was 50%N+Green Seeker (GS) >33%N+GS >RDN>70%N+GS. The system productivity (maize equivalent yield) under ZT+R in combination with 50%BN+GS was 15.0% higher than crops grown under ZT-R with RDN.The wheat equivalent yield under the ZT+R treatment is found to be higher (5.97) in the 50%BN+GS, which was 18% higher than the recommended dose of nitrogen treatment (5.04) and 28% higher than the 70%BN+GS treatment (4.68). Results demonstrated that plots with residue retention performed better, showing a 10% increase in system productivity. The study concludes that a ZT-based system with maize-based crop rotations (MWMb) with crop residue retention and precision nitrogen management can improve soil properties and system productivity in northwestern India.
Keywords: soil bulk density, soil penetration resistance, Soil Organic Carbon, Residue retention, nitrogen management, Inceptisols, System productivity
Received: 16 Jul 2023; Accepted: 26 Jul 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Dinesh, Sharma, Jat, Venkatramanan, Boomiraj, Prasad, Anokhe, Selvakumar, Rathika, Ramesh, Bandyopadhyay, Jayaraman, Karuppanan Ramasamy, Sinduja, Sathya, Rao and Kadam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Govindaraj K. Dinesh, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India
Dinesh K. Sharma, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India
Shankar L. Jat, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India
Kovilpillai Boomiraj, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641 003, Tamil Nadu, India
Selvaraj Selvakumar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641 003, Tamil Nadu, India
S Rathika, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Trichy, 620 027, Tamil Nadu, India
Murugaiyan Sinduja, National Agro Foundation (NAF), Chennai, India
Velusamy Sathya, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB), Chennai, India
Cherukumalli S. Rao, National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (ICAR), Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.