Katrien Steenmans
Rosalind Malcolm- 1Centre for Private Governance, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 2School of Law, Environmental Regulatory Research Group, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
Editorial on the Research Topic
Law, policy and the governance of sustainable food systems
Introduction
There are myriad challenges facing local to national to global food systems. The Russia-Ukraine war is just one recent example demonstrating the “underlying rigidities, vulnerabilities, and inefficiencies in global food systems” (Hassen and Bilali, 2022) with impacts not only on the ability of meeting consumers' needs in food-importing countries, but also on the ability of international agencies, such as the World Food Programme, to provide food aid and on the risks of food shortages on additional human displacements and geopolitical conflicts (Behnassi and Haiba, 2022). Other challenges include climate change affecting soil fertility, water availability, reduced food yield, reduced food nutrient concentration, etc. (e.g., Owino et al., 2022); the nutrition crisis as a result of low-quality diets (e.g., Haddad et al., 2016); and unsustainable levels of food waste with farms alone producing 1.2 billion tons of food waste annually, which is enough to feed the 870 million undernourished four times over (WWF-UK, 2021). There is increased attention on these critical issues, with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2 aimed at ending hunger, achieving food security and improved nutrition, and promoting sustainable agriculture with its impacts on climate change, and SDG 12.3 targeting to halve per capita global food waste and reducing food losses across production and supply chains (United Nations, 2015).
This Research Topic focuses on the role of law, policy, and other governance mechanisms in contributing to possible effective responses and solutions to these numerous food challenges. Some dimensions of food are still emerging (e.g., the global system of food law—van der Meulen, 2010), though not all. In the UK, for example, food law has been an individually separate topic for a long time and certainly since reforms of the nineteenth century around weights, measures, and misdescriptions. Food law is not a distinct area but instead combines and transgresses various areas of law, including public and private law, international law, administrative law, environmental law etc. (van der Meulen, 2018; Urazbaeva et al., 2019; van der Meulen and Wernaart, 2019), with food waste law an additional area arguably “largely outwith” food law (Bradshaw, 2018). Food governance is even broader and understood as the “architecture of food systems” that has interactions vertically (i.e., across international, regional, national, etc. levels) as well as horizontally (i.e., involving diverse stakeholders at each level) (Berry, 2019; del Valle et al., 2022). Similarly to law and policy, food governance “is key to both ensure the sustainability of food systems performance and to avoid crises that could lead to threatening progress related to food and nutrition security” (del Valle et al., 2022). Moreover, it is also critical to balancing power, decision-making, and access to information across food systems (del Valle et al., 2022).
Overarching questions addressed within this Research Topic examining law, policy, and governance dimensions of sustainable food systems include: What are the challenges and opportunities for promoting the role of law and policy for enhancing sustainable food systems? What are design considerations for governance mechanisms of sustainable food systems? What are the roles of various actors in the management of sustainable food systems?
Overview of contributions
The articles within this Research Topic cover a broad range of topics, including diverse sector case studies, different governance levels, the role of various stakeholders, and particular laws, policies, and other governance mechanisms.
Kaur et al. focus on the challenges that huge amounts of data pose to the agricultural sector. In particular, this paper draws on anecdotal evidence of global best practices to provide recommendations for farmers, agriculture technology providers, governments and policy-makers, and other supply chain stakeholders on how to protect privacy and confidentiality of farm data.
The other articles focus on specific national and sub-national sectoral case studies to examine particular dimensions of law, policy, and governance of sustainable food systems. Fahmid et al. examine the Indonesian cocoa industry. Specifically, the focus is on the impact of certain policies on the competitiveness of this industry within the global market. Policies affecting the seed sector in Malawi is covered by Hunga et al.. They use policy process theory to explain events and identify key actors impacting the development of the policies in order to set out lessons learnt and recommendations to develop the seed sector as well as other economic sectors more broadly. Hidaru et al. similarly also focus on the role of different actors, but in relation to responding to disparities in infrastructure impacting social vulnerability to household food security between two Ethiopian neighboring weredas: Raya Alamata in Tigray and Raya Kobo in Amhara regional states.
Windfeld and Lhermie, Klebl et al., and Heyl et al. analyse case studies located in the Global North. Windfeld and Lhermie synthesize state of knowledge about true value of agricultural industries to the Canadian economy and identify knowledge gaps that need to be addressed, which is needed to inform policy-making. Heyl et al. also focus on the agricultural sector, but in relation to examining how the EU's Common Agricultural Policy is implemented in Germany in relation to the nutrient objective of the Farm to Fork Strategy and within the wider international context of the Paris Agreement and Convention on Biological Diversity. Finally, Klebl et al. calculate the optimal number of food hubs and their optimal spatial location within Berlin, and the implications for current policies in Berlin and recommendations based on those.
Conclusion
The contributions to this Research Topic demonstrate the diversity and complexity of sustainable food systems. They only scratch the surface with many topics, including opportunities, perspectives, case studies, and stakeholder perspectives, still left to explore. Some recommended areas for further research include:
• Both public and private law and policy measures for fostering sustainable food systems (e.g., labeling; voluntary or mandatory reporting requirements on food waste; standards and certifications for sustainable food production or consumption);
• Regulatory opportunities and challenges for promoting sustainable circular economy approaches within food production and supply chains (including end-of-life);
• Justice and equity issues related to the governance of sustainable food systems;
• Design considerations of governance mechanisms for sustainable food systems;
• Law and policy incentives and barriers to prevent food waste before it is even produced, as well as those to reduce the “wasting” of any produced food waste;
• The role of technological innovations (e.g., Internet of Things; Artificial Intelligence; smart labels) in supporting the governance of sustainable food systems; and
• The role of food and agriculture in international trade agreements.
Other areas are also highlighted within each of the articles within this Research Topic. In general, further research is needed to develop the landscape of existing and possible governance (including law and policy) options to enhance sustainable food systems.
Author contributions
KS: Writing—original draft, review, and editing. RM: Writing—review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the contributors and peer reviewers.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Behnassi, M., and Haiba, M. E. (2022). Implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for global food security. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 754–755. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01391-x
Berry, E. M. (2019). Sustainable food systems and the Mediterranean diet. Nutrients 11, 2229. doi: 10.3390/nu11092229
Bradshaw, C. (2018). Waste law and the value of food. J. Environ. Law 30, 311–331. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqy009
del Valle, M., Shields, K., Mellado, A. S. A. V., and Boza, S. (2022). Food governance for better access to sustainable diets: a review. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6, 784264. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.784264
Haddad, L., Hawkes, C., Waage, J., Webb, P., Godfray, C., and Toulmin, C. (2016). Food Systems and Diets: Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century. London: Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. Available online at: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/19323/ (accessed September 25, 2023).
Hassen, T. B., and Bilali, H. E. (2022). Impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war on global food security: towards more sustainable and resilient food sysems? Foods 11, 2301. doi: 10.3390/foods11152301
Owino, V., Kumwenda, C., Ekesa, B., Parker, M. E., Eworldt, L., Roos, N., et al. (2022). The impact of climate change on food systems, diet quality, nutrition, and health outcomes: a narrative review. Front. Clim. 4, 941842. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2022.941842
United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. Available online at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed September 26, 2023).
Urazbaeva, A., Szajkowska, A., Wernaart, B., Franssens, N. T., and Vaskoska, R. S. (2019). “Introduction,” in The Functional Field of Law: Reconciling the Market and Human Rights, eds A. Urazbaeva, A. Szajkowska, B. Wernaart, N. T. Franssens, and R. S. Vaskoska (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers), 17–23. doi: 10.3920/978-90-8686-885-8_0
van der Meulen, B. (2010). The global arena of food law: emerging contours of a meta-framework. Erasmus Law Rev. 3, 217. doi: 10.5553/ELR221026712010003004003
van der Meulen, B. (2018). The Functional Field of Law. European Institute for Food Law. Available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3128103 (accessed September 25, 2023).
van der Meulen, B. M. J., and Wernaart, B. F. W. (2019). “Food law and regulatory affairs,” in The Functional Field of Law: Reconciling the Market and Human Rights, eds A. Urazbaeva, A. Szajkowska, B. Wernaart, N. T. Franssens, and R. S. Vaskoska (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers), 21–43.
WWF-UK (2021). Driven to Waste: The Global Impact of Food Loss and Waste on Farms. Available online at: wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/food_practice/food_loss_and_waste/driven_to_waste_global_food_loss_on_farms/ (accessed September 25, 2023).
Keywords: food, food law, food governance, sustainable food, sustainable development
Citation: Steenmans K and Malcolm R (2023) Editorial: Law, policy and the governance of sustainable food systems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7:1304004. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1304004
Received: 28 September 2023; Accepted: 03 October 2023;
Published: 11 October 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Albie F. Miles, University of Hawaii–West Oahu, United States
Copyright © 2023 Steenmans and Malcolm. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Katrien Steenmans, a2F0cmllbi5zdGVlbm1hbnMmI3gwMDA0MDtqdXIua3UuZGs=