Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 19 October 2022
Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services
This article is part of the Research Topic Crop Pest Control and Pollination View all 11 articles

Editorial: Crop pest control and pollination

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
  • 3Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, China
  • 4Institute of Plant Protection, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China

Editorial on the Research Topic
Crop pest control and pollination

Crop production meets the basic need of human nutrition. Crop production in increasingly intensive, large-scale and simplified agricultural landscapes often face or suffer from various threats, such as pest damage (caused by insect pests, pathogenic microbes, nematode, weeds, rodents, and so on) or a shortage of pollinators. Crop pests can cause serious loss during crop production and food storage, however, effective pest management benefits to reduce crop loss and pesticide abuse. Moreover, most vegetable and fruit tree crops require insect pollination to ensure high yields and quality. Research on strategies and techniques of pest management and their potential impact on pest control and pollination in agricultural landscapes is of great significance to sustainable crop production (Gurr et al., 2017).

Over the past decades, pest control largely relied on pesticides which can control crop pests and decrease crop losses in the short term (Tilman et al., 2001; Ringland and George, 2011). However, pesticide abuse causes a series of problems in the long run, for example, the risk of development of pesticide resistance by crop pest, as well as pesticides residues in soil, water, and agricultural products (Van Meter et al., 2016). Long-term, improper, and excessive use of pesticides during crop production ultimately harms biodiversity and human health (Larsen et al., 2017). New strategies and techniques for environmentally-friendly pest control should be developed in order to support natural enemy and pollinator diversity while also supporting food production and bolstering food security, food safety and biodiversity protection.

There are ways in which crop pests are regulated from “top down” regulation of pests from natural enemies and biodiversity and from “bottom up” regulation of pests from plant defense mechanisms. Ecological regulation and control of pests in agricultural landscapes are always important frontier areas in science and technology for prevention and management of crop diseases and insect pests (Ouyang et al., 2020). Plant defenses are instinctive adaptations that decrease the damage and mortality caused by pests such as herbivores and pathogens (Coley and Barone, 2001). Omics is applied more and more widespread to illustrate signaling pathways, mechanism and candidate targets of plant immunity system. For instance, transcriptome analysis is an effective strategy to find out which signaling pathway(s) is related to some plant disease resistance, and screen the functional genes related to disease resistance. In addition, clone plant lesion mimic genes which display spontaneous cell death and activated plant disease resistance can also provide gene resource for crops breeding for pest control. Understanding how human activities, agricultural landscape structure and plant defenses influence crop diseases and insect pests and their natural enemies is important for prevention and management of pests (Thies and Tscharntke, 1999; Faulkner, 2016). Likewise, understanding how biodiversity influences ecosystem function and plant defenses can elucidate pest control mechanisms (Duffy et al., 2010).

In this Research Topic, we present nine articles that discuss specific aspects of ecological regulation and control of pests and defenses mechanisms in plant. Three of the articles (Dong et al.; Tripathi et al.; Suprapta) discuss the impacts of habitat management and natural enemies on crop pests. Four articles (Xie, Jiang, Huang, et al., Zhang et al.; Gao et al.; Tang et al.) focus on genome and transcriptome technologies for pest control. The last two articles (Wang et al.; Shen et al.) focus on lesion-specific mutants and the ways in which plant defense can regulate pests. The first article, Dong et al. reported ecological effects of flower and grass strips for increase of natural enemies in apple orchards in Beijing, China Beijing, China. Sowing plants strips that provide food resources (pollen, nectar and alternative prey) in orchards is a potential practice of habitat management for promoting biological control. The second article, Tripathi et al. assessed the impacts of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) on crop yield and biodiversity in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. The study compared the impacts of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) with other agricultural management practices on invertebrate pest and natural enemy diversity, and the associated effects on crop damage and crop yield. The findings illustrate that the CSA practices in the area, terracing and trenching with live and compost mulches, could promote crop production, pest suppression and agricultural income. The third article, by Suprapta reported the biological control of anthracnose disease on chili pepper using a beneficial microorganism formulation containing Paenibacillus polymyxa c1. Anthracnose disease on chili pepper has been known to seriously disturb the plant growth and obviously decrease the yield. The disease is caused by Colletotrichum spp. In Bali, Indonesia, six species of Colletotrichum have been identified: Colletotrichum scovillei, C. acutatum, C. nymphaeae, C. gloeosporioides, C. truncatum, and C. fructicola. The results revealed that the formulation of the beneficial microorganism P. polymyxa C1 effectively restraint the anthracnose disease on chili pepper, particularly on chili pepper cultivar Cabe Besar, and thus can be proposed as field testing to confirm its stability under field conditions.

Genome and transcriptome analysis technology is an effective systems-biology method for the investigation of pest and host plant. The two articles in this Research Topic by Xie, Jiang, Chen, et al., Zhang et al. reported the transcriptome profile of the pest Myllocerinus aurolineatus Voss in Tea Plants and soybean treated with Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxin Coronatine (COR), respectively. According to the reports, the global transcriptome profile of pest and host plant provides a valuable genomic resource and clues for further study the interaction between pest and plant, therefore, transcriptome sequencing promotes the development of new pest management strategies. The article by Gao et al. reported that RNA sequencing analysis of Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) reveals the mechanism underlying insecticide resistance. The study identified a total of 5,265 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). And, the transcriptome data generated in this study can be used for functional gene characterization such as aphid development, metabolism, environmental adaptation, and insecticide resistance. The article by Tang et al. reported that genome identification and expression analysis of GRAS family related to development, hormone and pathogen stress in Brachypodium distachyon which is a new model system for functional genomics like plant-pathogen interactions in grasses. This study used bioinformatics method to search and found 63 GRAS family genes in B. distachyon. These results will provide data source for further study of GRAS gene function in B. distachyon.

Furthermore, the another two articles by Wang et al. and Shen et al. reported that the lesion-mimic mutants are useful materials to dissect mechanisms controlling programmed cell death (PCD) and defense response in plants, and the lesion mimic genes are applicable gene resource for pest control. Two lesion mimic rice genes both located on chromosome 12 were mapped/cloned and reported in this Research Topic back to back (Wang et al.; Shen et al.). Interestingly, although both these two lesion mimic genes negatively regulate cell death and antioxidation metabolism, these two genes act opposite effect on disease resistance, which one is negative regulator of plant immunity and the other one is positive regulator (Wang et al.; Shen et al.). These findings further uncover the mechanism of lesion mimic genes regulating plant disease resistance and cell death, and provide valuable gene resource for rice resistance breeding.

Based on these findings in this Research Topic, habitat management could be used to promote the pest control with natural enemies, and plant defense could also be beneficial to suppress the occurrence and damage of pests. New strategies and techniques, which include “top down” regulation of pests from natural enemies and biodiversity and “bottom up” regulation of pests from plant defense, could be incorporated into integrated pest management in increasingly intensive, large-scale and simplified agricultural landscapes.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFF1301801) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (No. 2021JJ30010).

Acknowledgments

All authors of the Research Topic on Crop pest control regulated from natural enemies and plant defense for providing study cases to the Editorial.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Coley, P. A. and Barone, J. A. (2001). Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (Second Edition).

Google Scholar

Duffy, J. E., Cardinale, B. J., France, K. E., Mcintyre, P. B., Elisa, T., and Loreau, M. (2010). The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett. 10, 522–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faulkner, C. (2016). Defense mechanisms in plants. Encycloped. Immunobiol. 1, 389–396. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374279-7.12001-6

CrossRef Full Text

Gurr, G. M., Wratten, S. D., Landis, D. A., and You, M. S. (2017). Habitat management to suppress pest populations: progress and prospects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 62, 91–109. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larsen, A.E., Gaines, S.D., and Deschênes, O. (2017). Agricultural pesticide use and adverse birth outcomes in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Nat. Commun. 8, 302. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00349-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ouyang, F., Men, X., and Ge, F. (2020). “Landscape-level drivers of biocontrol and a case study from local to regional scale in China,” in Integrative Biological Control: Ecostacking for Enhanced Ecosystem Services, eds Gao, Y., Hokkanen, H. M. T., Menzler-Hokkanen, I. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), pp. 145–164.

Google Scholar

Ringland, J., and George, P. (2011). Analysis of sustainable pest control using a pesticide and a screened refuge. Evol. Applicat. 4, 459–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00160.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thies, C., and Tscharntke, T. (1999). Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285, 893–895. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5429.893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B, D'Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., et al. (2001). Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science. 13, 281–284. doi: 10.1126/science.1057544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Van Meter, R.J., Glinski, D.A., Henderson, W.M., and Purucker, S.T. (2016). Soil organic matter content effects on dermal pesticide bioconcentration in American toads (Bufo Americanus). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35, 2734–2741. doi: 10.1002/etc.3439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: crop production, pest control, agricultural landscapes, ecological regulation and control, plant defense

Citation: Ouyang F, Li W, Xie W and Men X (2022) Editorial: Crop pest control and pollination. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6:1028134. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.1028134

Received: 25 August 2022; Accepted: 03 October 2022;
Published: 19 October 2022.

Edited and reviewed by: Stacy Michelle Philpott, University of California, Santa Cruz, United States

Copyright © 2022 Ouyang, Li, Xie and Men. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fang Ouyang, ouyangf@ioz.ac.cn; Wei Li, liwei350551@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.