Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Cognitive Science

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1484536

This article is part of the Research Topic Teaching and Training in Psychophysiology and Neuroscience View all 4 articles

Visual Attentional Differences in Psychology Students With and Without Disabilities: A Pilot Study Assessing The Flanker Task For Prescriptive Visual Accommodative Technologies

Provisionally accepted
Anders Chan Anders Chan Zachary I. Harkinish-Murray Zachary I. Harkinish-Murray Sabrina Colmone Sabrina Colmone Jessica E. Orens Jessica E. Orens Sharon Thomas Sharon Thomas Nicole Albanese Nicole Albanese Katherine McCabe Katherine McCabe Rui Freitas Rui Freitas Stephanie Bailey Stephanie Bailey Ravi L. Ramdhari Ravi L. Ramdhari Michael T. Verrengia Michael T. Verrengia Kainaat F. Siddiqui Kainaat F. Siddiqui Oscar E Lopez Oscar E Lopez Stacey DeFelice Stacey DeFelice Basabi Runi Mukherji Basabi Runi Mukherji Lorenz S. Neuwirth, Ph.D. Lorenz S. Neuwirth, Ph.D. *
  • State University of New York at Old Westbury, Old Westbury, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The percentage of college students with disabilities has been growing and has doubled in the last two decades; thus, students with disabilities are pursuing college degrees in increasing numbers. Unfortunately, this population growth has not been matched with growth in available accommodative technologies in institutions of higher learning. Colleges and universities often do not have resources to fund and provide specific accommodative technology and support for this steadily increasing population. What is worse is that there is also a lag in emergent assessment and screening tools which are required to match student disabilities with appropriate accommodative technologies, resulting in a mismatch between student needs with appropriate accommodative technologies.The present pilot study was conducted with students with a range of disabilities, such as learning disabilities, emotional or psychiatric conditions, orthopedic or mobility impairments, attention deficit disorder/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, health impairments (HI), and multiple disabilities) which were assessed using a Flanker Task, specifically to determine how sensitive it was in detecting differences in their visual attention performance. This information could be used to predict whether the student would benefit from specific accommodative technologies.Materials and Methods: Undergraduate Psychology students with and without disabilities volunteered to participate in a triple-blind study that sought to investigate whether their visual attention performance on a 10-minute Flanker Task could be used to predict which students might benefit from visual accommodative technologies. The first experiment was used as a negative control

    Keywords: Visual Eye Tracking, Gazepoint Eye Tracking, Visual distractions, Visual Accommodative Technologies, Undergraduate psychology students, Students with a disability, visual attention, Pilot Study

    Received: 22 Aug 2024; Accepted: 04 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Chan, Harkinish-Murray, Colmone, Orens, Thomas, Albanese, McCabe, Freitas, Bailey, Ramdhari, Verrengia, Siddiqui, Lopez, DeFelice, Mukherji and Neuwirth, Ph.D.. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Lorenz S. Neuwirth, Ph.D., State University of New York at Old Westbury, Old Westbury, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more