data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ERRATUM article
Front. Psychol. , 08 September 2022
Sec. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement
Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026974
This article is part of the Research Topic From “Modern” to “Postmodern” Psychology: Is There a Way Past? View all 17 articles
This article is an erratum on:
Quantification in Experimental Psychology and Pragmatic Epistemology: Tension Between the Scientific Imperative and the Social Imperative
by Guyon, H., and Nôus, C. (2021). Front. Psychol. 11:603617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603617
The name previously presented as the second author is a fictional character, which is contrary to the authorship policies of Frontiers journals.
This name has been removed, and we have placed it in the acknowledgments instead, written as: “The authors would like to acknowledge Camille Noús, a symbol of scientific collaboration.”
The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original version of this article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: bio-power, epistemology, measurement, ontology, pragmatism, quantitative psychology, statistical positivism
Citation: Frontiers Production Office (2022) Erratum: Quantification in experimental psychology and pragmatic epistemology: Tension between the scientific imperative and the social imperative. Front. Psychol. 13:1026974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026974
Received: 24 August 2022; Accepted: 24 August 2022;
Published: 08 September 2022.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2022 Frontiers Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, cHJvZHVjdGlvbi5vZmZpY2VAZnJvbnRpZXJzaW4ub3Jn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.