A first ecological coherent assessment of eutrophication across the North-East Atlantic waters (2015–2020)
CORRECTION article
Corrigendum: A first ecological coherent assessment of eutrophication across the North-East Atlantic waters (2015-2020)
Provisionally accepted- 1 Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, United Kingdom
- 2 Deltares (Netherlands), Delft, Netherlands
- 3 Rijkswaterstaat, Postbus 2232, 3500 GE, Utrecht, Netherlands, Netherlands
- 4 Umweltbundesamt,, Dessau-Roßlau., Germany
- 5 AquaEcology (Institute for Aquatic Ecology), Steinkamp 19, 26125 Oldenburg, Germany
- 6 Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 7 Marine Directorate of the Scottish Government, Science, Evidence, Digital and Data Portfolio, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- 8 Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Nantes, Pays de la Loire, France
- 9 The ERM International Group Limited, Norwich, United Kingdom
- 10 Instituto Español de Oceanografía,, Fuengirola, Spain
- 11 Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany
- 12 Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 13 Portuguese Institute for Sea and Atmosphere (IPMA), Lisbon, Portugal
- 14 Environmental Protection Agency, Castlebar, Ireland
- 15 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Copenhagen, Denmark
- 16 Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Grimstad, Norway
- 17 Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (IMR), Bergen, Hordaland, Norway
- 18 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
- 19 Department of Coastal Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, Netherlands
- 20 OSPAR, London, England, United Kingdom
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Supplementary material Table S1 Step 3 as published. Where acknowledgement of the work was omitted from the legend caption. The corrected legend appears below.For the cluster analysis the chlorophyll signal from satellite data was decomposed into an interannual signal, a seasonal signal and a residual signal. The interannual signal can indicate long-term trends or regime shifts. The seasonal signal is an indication whether the blooms occur each year systematically in the same season or not. The residual signal gives an indication of the remaining variability and can give an indication of strongly varying conditions between years and seasons. With a statistical analysis using the various signals, Areas with similar phytoplankton dynamics in satellite data (courtesy of Xavier Desmit and Dimitry Van der Zande, unpublished results)" can be identified and merged (Figure A.3.1). Largely similar areas appeared in an analysis of patterns in primary production derived from satellite data.The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: same as original article Devlin MJ, Prins TC, Enserink L, Leujak W, Heyden B, Axe PG, Ruiter H, Blauw A
Received: 04 Dec 2024; Accepted: 13 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Devlin, Prins, Enserink, Leujak, Heyden, Axe, Ruiter, Blauw, Bresnan, Collingridge, DEVREKER, Fernand, Gomez Jakobs, Graves, Lefebvre, Lenhart, Markager, Nogueira, O’Donnell, Parner, Skarbøvik, Skogen, Sonesten, Van Leeuwen, Wilkes, Dening and IglesiasCampos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Michelle Jillian Devlin, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.