Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet.
Sec. Livestock Genomics
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1484287
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Livestock Genetics: Enhancing Breeding Practices and Improving Animal Health View all articles

The genetics of resistance to infectious pancreatic necrosis virus in rainbow trout unveiled through survival and virus load data

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Breeding and Genetics, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (Nofima), Tromsø, Troms, Norway
  • 2 Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Norway
  • 3 Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway
  • 4 Osland Genetics, Aas, Norway
  • 5 Center for Integrated Breeding Research, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis virus (IPNV) is one of the major threats to the animal welfare and economy of the rainbow trout farming industry. Previous research has demonstrated significant genetic variation for resistance against IPNV. The main objective of the study was to investigate the genetic architecture of resistance against IPNV in rainbow trout fry. To achieve this, 610 rainbow trout fry were bath challenged with the IPNV isolate (IPNV-AS) from Atlantic salmon reared at a commercial farm. The resistance against IPNV was accessed using three different phenotypes; binary survival (BS), total days survived (TDS) and virus load (VL) recorded on the fish throughout the 40-day challenge test. The IPNV-AS isolate resulted in an overall mortality of 62.1 %. The heritability estimates for survival (BS h 2 = 0.21 ± 0.06, TDS h 2 = 0.25 ± 0.07) and VL traits (h 2 = 0.23 ± 0.08) were moderate and indicative of potential use of selection for increased resistance to IPNV in rainbow trout selective breeding programs. The unity estimated genetic correlation between the two survival traits (BS and TDS) indicates that the traits can be considered the same trait. In contrast, a moderate favourable negative genetic correlation was found between VL and the survival traits (-0.61 ± 0.22 to -0.70 ± 0.19). The GWAS of the traits with many QTLs crossing the chromosome-wide Bonferroni corrected threshold indicates the polygenic nature of the studied traits. Most of the 10 possible identified genes were found to be linked with immunity or viral pathogenesis, which could be potentially responsible for the significant genetic variation in survival against the IPNV-AS. The QTL validation analysis revealed no significant difference in the mortalities and VL among the three genotypes of the detected QTL. The VL trait showed larger variation among the dead fry but with no significant difference in the proportion of IPNV VL positive samples in the dead and the survived fry. Overall, the results indicate the polygenic nature of the studied traits and support the use of genomic selection to improve resistance against IPNV in rainbow trout breeding companies.

    Keywords: IPNV, rainbow trout, Challenge test, GWAS, virus load, QTLs, selective breeding

    Received: 21 Aug 2024; Accepted: 28 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ahmad, Aslam, Evensen, Gamil, Berge, Solberg, Schmitt and Gjerde. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Aqeel Ahmad, Department of Breeding and Genetics, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (Nofima), Tromsø, NO-9291, Troms, Norway
    Bjarne R. Gjerde, Department of Breeding and Genetics, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (Nofima), Tromsø, NO-9291, Troms, Norway

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.