Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Food. Sci. Technol., 19 December 2024
Sec. Food Characterization

Chemical and nutritional characterization of loengo (Anisophyllea boehmii) fruits as a source of important bioactive with impact on health

  • 1LEAF | Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Research Unit of Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • 2Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária – Universidade José Eduardo dos Santos, Huambo, Angola

Introduction: Fruits are vital for promoting human health, as well as providing nutrients and other compounds linked to protection against many different diseases. Loengo (Anisophyllea boehmii Engl.) produces an edible stone fruit, plum-shaped (drupe), dark blue and maroon or carmine in the ripening stage, which is generally, consumed fresh in the production areas. Characterization of this fruit will contribute to estimate its nutritional and pharmaceutical potential impact. The present work aimed at the physic-chemical, nutritional and antioxidant activity characterization of loengo fruit.

Methods: Soluble solid contents (SSC) in the pulp were assessed in juice, at room temperature. Total protein was determined using the Dumas method. In what concerns the mineral composition were determined by ICP-OES. Organic acids identification and quantification was accomplished using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system. The total polyphenol contents (TPC) were determined in 96-well microplate assays. Antioxidant activity were determined by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay.

Results and discussion: Composition, in terms of fresh matter is as follows: pulp soluble sugar content (refractometer) is 19.5% ± 0.02%, and pulp titratable acidity 1.2% ± 0.1% expressed in citric acid; total protein content is 7.4% ± 0.02%, 8.0% ± 0.1%, 16.9% ± 0.2%, for the peel, pulp and seed, respectively. In what concerns the mineral composition, the results obtained show that it is a good source of minerals, mainly potassium and phosphorus, but also calcium, sulfur, and magnesium, with the pulp richer in potassium, the seed in phosphorus, and the peel in calcium. As expected, the pulp showed the highest total soluble sugar content, whereas the seed had the lowest. The main sugars found in the pulp were glucose and fructose. In the peel citric acid was the main organic acid found, together with malic, oxalic, and ascorbic acids. Most antioxidant activity was found in the seed. The results of this work provide important basic information to recommend the consumption of this fruit for its sweet taste, chemical and nutritional composition, and, most of all, for its richness in total phenolic compounds for it potential to formulate nutraceutical foods.

Introduction

The consumption of fruits is vital for the promotion of human health, as natural sources of nutrients and vitamin C, as well as of phenolic compounds (Junqueira-Gonçalves et al., 2015; Bjørklund and Chirumbolo, 2017; Rodrigues et al., 2021). Many of these compounds have been linked to protection against different chronic pathologies associated with oxidative damage, whilst also exhibiting antimicrobial and other biological activities (Gironés-Vilaplana et al., 2014; Junqueira-Gonçalves et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2018). Some edible fruits are rich sources of minerals, as well as of phenolic compounds, which are responsible for their red, violet, purple, and blue colors (Maro et al., 2013; Redondo et al., 2021). They exhibit a wide range of antioxidant protective activities and other preventive benefits, including protection of genomic DNA integrity and potent cardioprotective, neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic properties (Skrovankova et al., 2015; Graça et al., 2020). One of the most significant health advantages of these fruits is their capacity to prevent metabolic disorders, which are directly linked to dietary habits (Lima et al., 2016; Bjørklund and Chirumbolo, 2017; Paiva et al., 2024).

Climate change is widely recognized to have a significant negative impact on crop production and food safety everywhere in the world (Alam et al., 2011), clearly affecting and reducing fruit production and the quality of nutritional diet intake. The human population is continuously increasing, and the importance of food and nutritional security demands exploring alternative food resources. According to Iwatani and Yamamoto (2019), since the ‘90s, the Food for Specified Health Uses (FOSHU; Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) has been searching for new types of foodstuffs, which alongside with nutrients, present positive effects on the consumer’s health, as well as an opportunity to contribute to socioeconomic development. Recently, the global and individual consumption of functional foods and the interest in dark-colored fruits has increased considerably. The proposed way to improve food safety is to use all available safe, nutritious, and good-quality foods. Therefore, knowledge of the nutritional values and potential benefits that can be provided to humans by edible but as-yet-unexplored novel foods is a critical factor (Jacobs and Steffen, 2003; Das et al., 2012; Maro et al., 2013).

Loengo (Anisophyllea boehmii Engl.) produces an edible stone fruit (drupe), plum-shaped, dark blue, and maroon or carmine in the ripening stage. The mesocarp is fleshy with a pale reddish color, edible, and with a bittersweet flavor. The fruit is mainly consumed fresh (in nature), but it can also be processed into juice or jam, with the mesocarp (pulp) and exocarp (peel) as the most edible parts; the seed is rarely consumed. The stone (seed) comprises a considerable proportion of the fruit, the pulp layer is relatively thin and strongly attached to the stone, whereas the peel is very thin and completely attached to the pulp (Ruffo et al., 2002; Ibrahim et al., 2015). The seeds may have nutritional and pharmaceutical value, but are usually discarded after consuming the pulp (Ibrahim et al., 2015; Nkengurutse et al., 2016).

Loengo occurs naturally in different African countries, namely, in high rainfall areas of Zambia, Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Burundi (Chen et al., 2015; Nkengurutse et al., 2016), and Angola (Sanfilippo, 2014; Chen et al., 2015). In Angola, loengo occurs mainly in the tropical climate regions which surround the provinces of Bié, Huambo, Huila, Lunda Sul and Malange (Chen et al., 2015). Nkengurutse et al. (2016) reported that fruits ripen between mid-November and early December. Loengo seeds may be used as a food ingredient or supplement; they are rich in L-arginine and exhibit healing and anti-inflammatory activities in the human body, in addition to being effective in diseases of the cardiovascular system (Kurhaluk, 2023). In Zambia, loengo fruits are consumed in juices and porridge and are also used in folk medicine (Kalaba et al., 2009). In Angola, these fruits are often consumed in nature. They are one of the traded wild fruits in Angola and constitute a source of income for farmers (Sanfilippo, 2014). In addition to consumption as a fruit, it may be prepared in juices or cooked in jellies and sweets to avoid the large losses observed during the harvest season (Curi et al., 2016; Zhang and Shao, 2015). The characterization of this fruit could contribute to a detailed estimate of the nutritional and pharmaceutical value of loengo, thus contributing to alternative nutritional food sources. The present work aimed at the physico-chemical, nutritional, and antioxidant activity characterization of the loengo fruit.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

All the reagents used were of analytical or HPLC grade. Methanol and ethanol (96% v/v) were purchased from Fisher Chemicals (Fair Lawn, NJ, United States). Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, sodium carbonate, gallic acid, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, L (+)-ascorbic acid, DL-malic acid and anthrone reagent (9,10-dihydro-9-oxoanthracene) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). D (+)-Glucose and D (−)-fructose were purchased from VWR International (Radnor, PA, United States). DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid), acetic acid, sodium acetate, TPTZ (2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine), hydrochloric acid, iron (III) chloride hexahydrate, sodium hydroxide and acetone were purchased from LabChem (Zelienople, PA, United States). Ultrapure water was obtained from a Synergy® Water Purification System (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, United States).

Plant material

Loengo fruits were collected in the Huambo province, central plateau of Angola, at an altitude of 1,774 m. The harvested ripe fruits were selected to avoid the presence of spots or symptoms of disease. The fruits were thoroughly washed with water to remove impurities and stored frozen at −80°C until use. All tests were performed in triplicate.

Measurement of physical and chemical properties

A digital caliper was used to measure the equatorial and polar diameters of 21 loengo fruits under optimal temperature and humidity conditions (20°C–22°C and 40% humidity). The fresh weight of the whole loengo fruit was determined using an OHAUS CS200 electronic balance; the loengo fruit components were separated into peel, pulp, and seeds, and analyzed separately.

Determination of pH, titratable acidity and soluble solid contents

The pulp pH was determined using an Orion potentiometer, model 420 (Orion Research, Inc., Boston MA). The titratable acidity of loengo pulp was obtained using method 942.15 of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2000). The titration results were expressed in g citric acid/100 g of sample. Pulp soluble solid contents (SSC) were assessed in triplicate, at room temperature, in juice, using a pocket refractometer ATAGO PAL-1 0.0%–53.0% BRIX, (3810) Digital Hand-HELD, Tokyo, and expressed as g sucrose/100 g of sample.

Determination of weight, moisture and ash

To determine the moisture content of the loengo fruit peel, pulp, and seeds, the method used by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2003a) was followed; these materials were first placed in a filter box and weighed. After rigorous weighing, the boxes were placed with the lid open in a forced-air oven at 105 °C during 48 h (until the weight became constant). Afterwards, the boxes were covered to minimize atmospheric water absorption, cooled inside a desiccator, and weighed. The water content of the loengo fruit was calculated as the difference between the fresh weight and the dry weight divided by the fresh weight. The total ash content was determined by weighing the ashes left after combustion at 500°C in a muffle furnace for 24 h. The ash content was calculated by dividing the ash weight by the fresh weight of the sample (Association of Official Analytical chemists, 2003b).

Determination of crude fiber, lipids and total protein

Determination of crude fiber and lipid content were carried out following the Weende method, as previously described by (Duarte et al., 2021). Crude fiber was measured using 1 g of dried biological material. The extraction of sugars and starch was achieved through acid hydrolysis with 1.25% (v/v) H₂SO₄, followed by alkaline hydrolysis with 1.25% (w/v) NaOH, which removed proteins and some hemicellulose and lignin. Subsequently, 150 mL of 0.2 M KOH was added to the sample, boiled for 30 min and the sample was washed with acetone in a Kitasato flask. The sample was then dried in an oven at 105°C and subsequently in a muffle furnace at 550°C during 8 h. Lipids were extracted from fresh 1 g biological material samples with ethyl ether in a Soxhlet apparatus (IPQ, 2009). Following solvent evaporation, fat residues were dried at 105°C ± 2°C until a constant weight was achieved. Total protein content was determined using the Dumas method (Kirsten, 1979), assuming an average of 16% (w/w) nitrogen content in the loengo fruit proteins. These tests were carried out in triplicate.

Determination of mineral composition

The mineral composition of the fruit samples was determined using acid digestion, according to the methodology outlined by (Martins et al., 2020), followed by absorbance readings in an Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical-Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES; Thermo ScientificTM iCap Series 7000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). A sample of 0.25 g was digested with a mixture of nitric acid and hydrochloric acid (ratio 1:3) at 105°C. The mixture was cooled and, upon reaching room temperature, filtered and diluted to 50 mL with distilled water. The resulting extracts were subsequently analyzed for potassium, phosphorus, calcium, sulfur, magnesium, sodium, manganese, zinc, iron, boron, and copper.

Characterization of fruit sugars

Sugars were extracted from the loengo fruit peel, pulp, and seed with an aqueous solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, for 1 h, at 4°C and continuous agitation. The mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 × g and 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was collected. Subsequently, the sugars were separated from the macromolecules by size exclusion chromatography. The filtration process was conducted using exclusion chromatography in PD-10 columns (prepacked with Sephadex G-25 M). The gel contained in these columns comprises dextran granules (glucose polymers) with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of 5 kDa (solution 1).

Carbohydrates determination

Total carbohydrates were quantified by the anthrone method, as proposed by Trevelyan et al. (1952), using solution 1 (see above, section “Characterization of fruit sugars”). The fruit samples were mixed with concentrated sulfuric acid (75% v/v) and anthrone reagent (9,10-dihydro-9-oxoanthracene) and then boiled until the reaction was complete. With this treatment, glycosidic bonds were hydrolyzed, and the monosaccharides were dehydrated, forming furfural or hydroxymethylfurfural, which then reacted with the anthrone reagent, producing a blue-green colored compound. Total sugars were then quantified by spectrophotometry (Bio-Tek synergy spectrophotometer) at a wavelength of 630 nm, employing a standard curve of sucrose (0–100 mg/mL).

Organic acids identification and quantification

Sample extracts (solution 1; see above, section “Characterization of fruit sugars”) were diluted (1:20 v/v) in 25 mM sulfuric acid. Separation of the organic acids and sugars from all the extracts was accomplished using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Chromaster, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a UV–visible detector 5,420 (Chromaster, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) monitored at 210 nm for the organic acids, and a Refractive Index (RI) Detector 5,450 (Chromaster, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) for the sugars. The organic acids and sugars were separated using an ionic exclusion column (RezexTM ROA Organic Acid H+ (8%) column, 300 mm × 7.8 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, United States) at 65°C. Sulfuric acid (5 mM) was used as the mobile phase at a 0.5 mL/min flow rate. Organic acids identification and quantification were achieved using malic, citric, oxalic and ascorbic acids as standards, at concentrations ranging from 0 to 20 g/L. The results were represented in g/L of the corresponding organic acid (calibration curves: y = 4.45 × 10−7, R2 = 0.9996 for malic acid; y = 4.12 × 10−7, R2 = 0.9994 for citric acid; y = 3.87 × 10−8, R2 = 0.9995 for oxalic acid; and y = 5.37 × 10−8, R2 = 0.9992 for ascorbic acid). Sugar identification and quantification were achieved using glucose and fructose as standards, at concentrations ranging from 0 to 40 g/L. The results were expressed in g/L of the corresponding sugar (calibration curves: y = 1.48 × 10−6, R2 = 0.9996 for glucose and y = 1.43 × 10−6, R2 = 0.9996 for fructose). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Assessment of total phenolic content

The procedure described by Rufino et al. (2010) was followed to determine the content in phenolic compounds. Each fruit part crushed was weighed (1.0 g) and mixed with 10 mL of methanol/water (50:50 v/v). The mixture was stirred vigorously for 30 s until complete homogenization and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the samples were centrifuged at 25,400 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was retrieved. Subsequently, 10 mL of acetone/water (70:30 v/v) was added to the pellet, and the process was repeated under the same conditions described above. The methanol and acetone supernatants were combined, and distilled water was added until a total volume of 25 mL was reached.

Determination of total polyphenols

The total polyphenol contents (TPC) were determined in 96-well microplate assays according to the method described by Graça and colleagues (2020). The standard curve was prepared based on a acetone (70%) solution of gallic acid with concentrations ranging from 0 to 9 μg mL-1, R2 = 0.9984. The peel, pulp and seed extracts, or gallic acid (150 μL at 100 μg/mL), were added to Folin–Ciocalteau reagent (150 μL, at 0.1 M) and, after 10 min, were thoroughly mixed with sodium carbonate (300 μL at 7.5% w/v). The mixture was then incubated at room temperature in the dark for 2 h. Absorbance (760 nm) was measured, and the TPC results are reported in mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g of peel, pulp and seed extract.

The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) experiment was conducted according to (Nunes et al., 2020) by combining 100 μL of sample extract with 3.9 mL of DPPH radical solution to assess the radical scavenging capacity. The samples were shaken vigorously and incubated for 40 min at room temperature, protected from light; the absorbance was measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States) at 515 nm against methanol. The standard curve was prepared based on a methanolic solution of Trolox (6-hydroxy-2, 5, 7, 8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) with concentrations ranging from 0 to 1,000 μg mL−1, R2 = 0.9958. The samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the results were expressed as mg of Trolox per 100 g dry weight (DW).

The ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was performed according to the previously described procedure (Nunes et al., 2020). FRAP test solution was prepared by mixing at a ratio of 10:1:1 (v/v/v) 0.3 M acetate buffer at pH 3.6, 10 mM 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ) prepared in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM aqueous iron (III) chloride hexahydrate solution. A total of 90 μL of sample extract, 270 μL of distilled water, and 2.7 mL of test solution were vortexed and incubated for 30 min in a water bath (PrecisionTM 2,864, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) at a temperature of 37°C, protected from light. The absorbance was measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (Cary 100, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States) at a wavelength of 595 nm against the test solution. The standard curve was prepared based on a methanolic solution of Trolox with concentrations ranging from 0 to 800 μg mL-1, R2 = 0.9971. The samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the results were expressed as mg of Trolox per 100 g DW.

Statistical analyses

All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). RStudio (version 2022) was used to compare different treatments, using one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey’s test was used to compare differences between groups, and statistical discrepancies with a p-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The average weight of the loengo fruit is approximately 9.4 g, with an oval structure measuring 20.01 mm ± 2.7 mm in equatorial diameter and 34.8 mm ± 1.8 mm in polar diameter. One of the most notable characteristics of these fruits is their high soluble sugar content (19.5% ± 0.02%) and low titratable acidity (1.2% ± 0.1%), which strongly contribute to a distinctive flavor. The loengo fruit primarily comprises pulp and peel, which collectively accounting for 72.88% of the fruit total weight. The pulp, comprising 74.26% water, is the tissue with the most significant weight in the fruit. The peel, in contrast, is rich in ash and crude fiber, while the seed is abundant in protein and lipids.

The results obtained demonstrate that the mineral composition of the peel, pulp, and seed presents a range of macro- and microminerals. The peel contains a large amount of K and Ca, the pulp contains a large proportion of K and S, whereas the seed contains a great abundance of K and P, these represent the main minerals found in this fruit. In addition to the aforementioned minerals, loengo fruits contain notable quantities of Zn, Mg, Fe, and Mn.

Loengo fruit total carbohydrates (including those derived from mono, oligo, and polysaccharides), quantified by the anthrone method, show a higher sugar concentration (g.100 g-1 DW) in the pulp (70.28 ± 1.48), followed by the peel (34.99 ± 0.23), and finally the seed (6.47 ± 1.43), the component of the fruit that presents the lowest quantity of sugars. The sugars identified were glucose and fructose, which are present in similar amounts in the skin and pulp, with more glucose than fructose in the seed.

Citric acid is the most abundant organic acid present in the different tissues of the loengo fruit. Other organic acids, such as oxalic acid, ascorbic acid, and malic acid, were also present. The organic acids identified in the loengo fruit (citric, malic, oxalic, and ascorbic) exhibited a higher concentration in the peel, and the pulp contains a higher concentration of ascorbic acid than the seed.

The loengo seed contains a higher concentration of total phenolic compounds, with 117.09 mg GAE per 100 g of DW, compared to the peel (38.07 mg GAE per 100 g of DW) and the pulp (25.46 mg GAE per 100 g of DW), which exhibited lower concentrations. However, there was no significant difference (p < 0.05) between the peel and pulp phenolic contents. Not surprisingly, the seed higher enhanced antioxidant activity, while the pulp demonstrated an antioxidant activity with notable similarity to the peel.

Discussion

Physicochemical parameters

The quality of fruits may be assessed by some chemical and physical parameters that are crucial for consumer acceptability (Kitzberger et al., 2017). The variation in weight and in polar and equatorial parameters among loengo fruits collected from Huambo, presented in Table 1, is minimal, thus allowing the results to be accurately expressed as mean ± SD. The average weight of each fruit is 9.4 g ± 0.02 g. The fruits of the plum variety studied by Kitzberger and colleagues (2017) were about 4.5 times heavier than the loengo fruit, with an average weight of 42.3 g. Stanley cultivar plums are larger than loengo fruits (Ertekin et al., 2006). In turn, loengo fruit weights are higher than those of blackberries (6.3 g fresh weight) (Miloševi et al., 2016). The loengo fruits are dark blue and maroon or carmine drupes in the ripening stage ellipsoid (Figure 1), with the following average diameters: equatorial 20.0 mm ± 2.7 mm and polar of 34.8 mm ± 1.8 mm. These values are consistent with previous reports (Ruffo et al., 2002) for loengo fruits from Tanzania. These results are different from data published by Nkengurutse et al. (2021), who reported that the average length ranges from 33 to 40 mm, the width between 29 and 34 mm, and the average weight between 16 and 25 g. Variations in weight can be influenced by factors such as variety, soil, and environmental conditions (Skrovankova et al., 2015).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Physicochemical properties characteristics of loengo fruit.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Size and external appearance of loengo fruits.

The loengo pulp has a sweet and sour taste, with a content of soluble solids (°Brix) of 19.5%, which is higher than that of the plum 10.7%; (Kitzberger et al., 2017), the blackberry (8.3%), the strawberry (10.4%), the blackcurrant (10.6%) the peach and the nectarine (Miloševi et al., 2016; Pandey et al., 2021). Loengo titratable acidity was determined as (1.2% ± 0.1%) expressed in citric acid, being more acidic than the strawberry (0.7%) and less acidic than the red currant (1.3%) (Miloševi et al., 2016). Peach (0.8%) and nectarine (0.9%) have less acidity than the loengo fruit (Pandey et al., 2021). The presence of compounds of an acidic nature, such as amino acids, phenolic compounds, fatty acids, and other organic acids, is related to the titratable acidity for a fruit tissue/organ (Castro et al., 2023). The composition and content of soluble solids in the fruit may vary depending on several factors, including the cultivar and variety, the location where it is grown, the environmental conditions, the plant nutrition, the stage of ripeness, and the time of harvest. Additionally, the length of post-harvest storage and the conditions or processing methods employed can also influence the composition of soluble solids in the berry crop (Kim et al., 2013; Skrovankova et al., 2015).

Approximate composition of Anisophyllea boehmii fruits

As expected, the pulp of loengo fruit contained more water than the peel and seeds. The water content of loengo fruit components was 74.3% (w/w) in the pulp, 64.3% (w/w) in the peel, and 39.1% (w/w) in the seed, with a significant difference among them, according to the approximate composition of A. boehmii fruits shown in Table 2. The loengo fruit exhibited a significantly lower moisture content when compared to other stone fruits, including apricots 83.0% w/w; (Hussain et al., 2021a), plums 87.2% w/w; (Hussain et al., 2021b), and peaches 89.0% w/w; (Hussain et al., 2021c).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Approximate composition of peel, pulp, and seed for loengo fruits.

The loengo fruit is rich in crude fiber in all its components, with the peel containing a higher amount of fiber than the pulp and seeds (Table 2). The loengo seed was the richest in lipids and proteins, showing significant differences when compared to the pulp and peel. When working on the composition of seeds from A. boehmii, Nkengurutse et al. (2016) obtained results for ash (2.5% w/w), oil (24.0% w/w), and protein (12.0% w/w). The results obtained for ash and oil agree with the data obtained in present work. However, we found a higher percentage of protein in the seed (16.9% w/w) (Table 2).

The ash content (w/w) in fruit stones seeds, such as peach, apricot, and plum, ranged from 6.1% ± 0.1%, 4.8% ± 0.4%, and 2.16% ± 0.02%, respectively. The crude fiber in percentage for the same crops were peach (8.6% ± 0.0%), apricot (7.5% ± 0.0%) and plum (21.4% ± 0.2%), with only plum having a higher crude fiber content when compared to the seed of loengo (Rodríguez-Blázquez et al., 2023).

As described Rodríguez-Blázquez and colleagues (2023), a comparison of the loengo seed with that from other fruits stones, reveals a high degree of similarity, despite the loengo having a higher protein content (per g of fresh fruit) than the cherry and a lower amount than the peach, medlar. Additionally, the loengo seed has a higher percentage of water when compared to other seeds.

The results of our study indicate that the loengo fruit is richer in proteins, lipids and crude fibers than other stone fruits. Specifically, plums (Hussain et al., 2021b) exhibited 0.7% (w/w), 0.3% (w/w), and 2.2% (w/w) protein, lipid, and total fiber content, respectively. Similarly, peaches (Hussain et al., 2021c) exhibited 0.9% (w/w), 0.3% (w/w), and 1.5% (w/w) protein, lipid, and total fiber content, respectively. Finally, apricots (Hussain et al., 2021a) exhibited 0.7% (w/w), 0.4% (w/w), and 2.4% (w/w) protein, lipid, and total fiber content, respectively.

The loengo fruit approximate composition differs from the African wild fig (Ficus capensis) in what concerns moisture (33.2% w/w), dry matter (66.3% w/w), ash (7.7% w/w), protein (1.4% w/w), fat (4.5% w/w) and fiber (3.2% w/w) (Okoroh et al., 2019).

Mineral composition

The Loengo fruit have a nutritional interest due to its mineral content (Table 3). In what concerns A. boehmii seeds and as reported by Nkengurutse and collaborators (2016), the mineral composition expressed in mg.100 g-1, is as follows: K: 387.2, P: 267.01, Mg: 86.01, Ca: 43.8, and Fe: 2.3. These values are considerably lower than those observed in the present study. We suggest that this discrepancy is motivated by the different soil and climate conditions where the trees were grown (Onivogui et al., 2014). However, the same authors, Nkengurutse et al. (2021), compared the mineral composition of the same crop from different locations in Uganda and observed that in specific locations, the Anisophyllea bohemii fruit presented (mg.100 g-1) Ca: 87.2, Mg: 135.7 and Fe: 3.6 values that were close to those obtained in the present work. In the work reported by Onivogui and colleagues (2014) on Anisophyllea laurina fruit, K and Ca were the predominant minerals, with concentrations varying from 1,434.4 mg 100 g-1 DW in the pulp and 411.3 mg 100 g-1 DW in the seed for K, to 185.5 mg 100 g-1 DW (pulp) and 64.3 mg 100 g-1 DW (seed) for Ca, thus presenting similar concentrations to the loengo fruit.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Mineral composition of peel, pulp and seed of loengo fruits.

A comparison of the mineral composition of loengo with those of hard stone fruits, including apricot (Hussain et al., 2021a), peach (Hussain et al., 2021b), and plum (Hussain et al., 2021c), revealed that loengo exhibited a higher concentration of essential minerals, including K, Mg, P, and Zn. Despite the fact that Ca and Fe were found to be present in high quantities in the peaches, these findings suggest that loengo may offer a unique nutritional profile, particularly in terms of its mineral content. Therefore, loengo fruit may be regarded as a good source of minerals, especially K, P, Ca, and Mg (Table 3).

Sugars and organic acids profiling

Sugars represent one of the main components of edible fruit quality by imparting sweetness as one of the attributes influencing the degree of consumer satisfaction (Nowicka et al., 2019). Sugars and organic acids are important compounds contributing to the flavor of fruits and juices, promoting a strong impact on the sensory quality and on some chemical characteristics of these foods, such as pH, total acidity, sweetness, microbial stability, and general acceptability, and may also be used to predict the ripening fruit stage (Rodrigues et al., 2021; Oliveira et al., 2014). Loengo fruit total carbohydrates (including those derived from mono, oligosaccharides), quantified by the anthrone method, show a greater carbohydrate concentration (expressed in g.100 g-1 DW) in the pulp (70.3 ± 1.5), followed by the peel (35.0 ± 0.2), with the seed (6.5 ± 1.4) being the fruit component presenting the lowest quantity of carbohydrate, as indicated (Table 4). Glucose and fructose were found in similar amounts in the peel and the pulp. However, these sugars exhibited differential expression in the seed, with glucose being the predominant sugar in this fruit component.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Carbohydrate content of loengo fruit.

In their study, Nkengurutse and collaborators (2016) identified 48.5 g.100 g-1 ± 0.4 g.100 g-1 DW of carbohydrates present in the seed of A. boehmii. These values are similar to the sugar contents found in the pulp in the present study. The carbohydrate contents of the pulp and seeds of A. laurina were exceptionally high, at 89.8 g.100 g-1 DW and 71.1 g.100 g-1 DW, respectively (Onivogui et al., 2014).

In the present work, we used only low molecular weight carbohydrates or simple sugars found in the loengo fruit. These simple sugars play crucial roles in providing energy, facilitating metabolic processes, enhancing nutrient absorption, and contributing to the flavor profile of foods (Berg et al., 2015). These sugars are integral to various biochemical and physiological processes in the human body. A primary energy source for cells, glucose is vital for brain function and physical activity (Nelson and Cox, 2017). Fructose is a naturally occurring sugar that is metabolized primarily in the liver (Vos et al., 2008). Galactose is essential for the synthesis of glycoproteins and glycolipids (Bailey, 2000). Low-weight sugars are a primary and immediate source of energy for the body. Glucose, in particular, is essential for cellular respiration and ATP production (Nelson and Cox, 2017). These sugars are pivotal in metabolic pathways, including glycolysis and the citric acid cycle, essential for energy production at the cellular level (Berg et al., 2015). The quality and composition of carbohydrates are primarily influenced by the variety of fruit, the weather conditions and the growing region (Lebaka et al., 2021) as well as the pre-harvest temperature, ripeness, variety of the crops under study and on some ecotypes (Trad et al., 2017). The carbohydrates present in the seeds of other stone fruits, such as peach (13 g.100 g-1 ± 3 g.100 g-1), apricot (15 g.100 g-1 ± 3 g.100 g-1), and plum (18 g.100 g-1 ± 2 g.100 g-1), were found to be slightly higher than those found in the loengo seed in this study (Rodríguez-Blázquez et al., 2023).

Among other stone fruits, apricots are a relatively concentrated source of carbohydrates. The carbohydrate content of fresh apricots is 10%–13%, while the total sugar content is approximately 9 g per 100 g of fruit weight. The sugar composition of the fruit includes glucose, fructose, sucrose, and sorbitol (Hussain et al., 2021a). Plums provide a relatively high proportion of carbohydrates in the diet, with approximately 15 g of carbohydrates per 100 g of fruit. Monosaccharides constitute a significant portion of the carbohydrates in plums, with glucose and sucrose being the primary contributors. Disaccharides, such as sucrose, are responsible for the sweetness of plums (Hussain et al., 2021c). The total carbohydrate content of peaches is 9.5 g per 100 g of fruit weight. Sucrose is the predominant sugar in the fruit, followed by glucose and fructose (Hussain et al., 2021b). In peach cultivars, the fructose content was higher than that of glucose (Nowicka et al., 2019). It can be concluded that these fruit stones, including loengo, are excellent sources of sugars, although the composition of these carbohydrates may vary depending on several factors.

Both organic acids and sugar compounds play a crucial role in shaping fruits' flavor and degree of sweetness. By analyzing these compounds in detail, we can accurately describe the sensory properties of these fruits (Nowicka et al., 2019). Citric acid was the most abundant organic acid present in the different components of the loengo fruit (Table 5), presenting itself as a potential source for this compound, with the peel containing the highest concentration. Other organic acids, such as oxalic acid, ascorbic acid and malic acid, were also present. The organic acids identified in the loengo fruit (citric, malic, oxalic, and ascorbic) exhibited a higher concentration in the peel, whereas the pulp exhibited a higher concentration of ascorbic acid than the seed. Onivogui and collaborators (2014) identified the presence of citric, fumaric, malic, tartaric, and oxalic acids in the fruit of A. laurina. Citric and malic acid were found to be the most abundant in the pulp, while tartaric acid was the most abundant in the seed of A. laurina fruit. However, the presence of ascorbic acid, which was identified in the present work, was not reported. In different mulberry genotypes (Morus spp.) studied by Eyduran and colleagues (2015a), malic acid was the main organic acid identified. However, grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) citric and tartaric acid were the most predominant (Eyduran et al., 2015b).

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Organic acid content in the peel, pulp and seed of loengo fruit.

There is a similarity between the main organic acids present in loengo fruit and the organic acids identified in peach fruits. Malic acid, quinic acid, and citric acid are the predominant organic acids in peach fruits (Nowicka et al., 2019).

Total polyphenols and antioxidant activity

Polyphenolic compounds (e.g., phenolic acids, flavonoids and anthocyanins) are regarded as one of the most crucial bioactive components of plants and fruits, offering a multitude of biological health benefits derived from their biological properties (Kim et al., 2013; Corrêa et al., 2023). In this context, the total polyphenol compounds (TPC) were evaluated in the loengo fruit. The results presented in Table 6 are comparable to those of A. laurina fruits, where the seeds exhibited a greater total polyphenolic content (TPC) (Onivogui et al., 2014), while the pulp exhibited a lower TPC level. There is a paucity of studies evaluating the total phenol content of loengo fruit. Nkengurutse et al. (2019) posited that the TPC of A. boehmii almond seed oils may be responsible for some bioactivity. Berries, particularly members of several families, such as Rosaceae (strawberry, raspberry, and blackberry) and Ericaceae (blueberries), are notable dietary sources of bioactive compounds, including ascorbic acid and phenolic compounds, such as phenolic acids and flavonoids. These compounds, including also anthocyanins, tannins, and ascorbic acid, act as potent antioxidants, helping to prevent inflammatory disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and various types of cancer (Batista et al., 2017; Ramos et al., 2023). Loengo presented noteworthy levels of total polyphenols (Table 6), although lower than those reported by other red fruits, such as blackberry and strawberry (Miloševi et al., 2016). When we compare to other stone fruits, such as peach, apricot and plum (Hong et al., 2021), our results indicate that the loengo seed exhibited a higher TPC and antioxidant activity. The considerable presence of total polyphenols in loengo fruits is consistent with the findings of Genskowsky et al. (2016), which indicate that dark blue fruits are rich in these compounds and can be utilized as a source of antioxidants (Eyduran et al., 2015a).

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of the loengo fruit.

According to Mousavi et al. (2019), stone fruits seed almonds, including peach (Prunus persica L.), cherry (Prunus avium L.) and damson (Prunus domestica subsp. Insititia L.) exhibited in mg GAE/g DW, 27.7; 38.9 and 25.6 respectively, higher total polyphenol content compared to loengo fruit. The TPC of the loengo seed was similar to that of the plum seed, therefore, the loengo seed may possess beneficial bioactivities for human health (Hong et al., 2021).

The peel exhibited a higher total phenolic content (TPC) than the pulp in mature fruit stones. The reduction in the phenolic content of the pulp can be attributed to a series of chemical and enzymatic changes of some phenols during the fruit ripening process. The seeds exhibited the highest total phenolic content, irrespective of the maturation stage (Redondo et al., 2021). The results obtained in the present study differ from those reported by Redondo and colleagues (2021), who analyzed the antioxidant activity by DPPH of various fruit stones, including apricot, plum and peach, and found differences between the pulp and skin of these fruits at commercial maturity stages. However, when using the FRAP methodology, the values obtained were similar to those reported in the present work.

Appropriate management during pre- and post-harvest handling, along with further characterization of phytochemicals, could help increase the levels of these compounds, leading to future improvement of the fruit not only to enhance organoleptic characteristics but also to benefit human health (Lara et al., 2020). Consequently, extracts derived from stone fruits, including loengo, can be a source of healthy beneficial compounds. The understanding of the nutritional and pharmaceutical properties of loengo fruits could enhance production systems and post-harvest conservation, as well as the potential for the development of nutraceutical foods (Chalchisa et al., 2022), improving nutrition and food security strategies, The high nutrient content of fruits suggests its future potential applications for the food and pharmaceutical industry (Dhatwalia et al., 2024).

Conclusion

Loengo (A. boehmii) occurs as spontaneous trees that are not cultivated as a crop in Huambo, Angola. Their fruits can be a food of the future, being a valuable source of nutrients and bioactive molecules for local populations, and if cultivated it can be a promising marketable fruit. These fruits were subject to chemical and nutritional characterization. The findings of this study provide consistent evidence to recommend the consumption of this fruit due to its sweet flavor, chemical and nutritional composition, and, most importantly, because it is rich in beneficial minerals and antioxidant bioactive compounds, which are important in the control of degenerative diseases. The loengo fruit and its potential derivatives can be considered a nutraceutical food. This fruit can be a valuable resource to improve nutrition and food safety strategies in the near future, where foods may have nutritional and pharmaceutical properties.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

AL: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization. MM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. CP: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. IS: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization. RF: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. INAGBE (National Institute for Scholarship Management) of the Government of Angola for funding the research project and LEAF research group.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Alam, M., Siwar, C., Murad, M., and Toriman, M. (2011). Impacts of climate change on agriculture and food security issues in Malaysia: an empirical study on farm level assessment. World Appl. Sci. J. 14, 1818–4952.

Google Scholar

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2000). AOAC official method 942.15 acidity (titratable) of fruit products’. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International.

Google Scholar

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2003a). AOAC method 925.10 (air oven method) for moisture in flour. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International.

Google Scholar

Association of Official Analytical chemists (2003b). Official methods of the AOAC, methods 923.03, 920.85, 920.87, 978.10, 950.46’. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International.

Google Scholar

Bailey, J. M. (2000). Molecular and cellular biology. Manhattan, New York: United States Harper and Row.

Google Scholar

Batista, A., Niccolai, A., Fradinho, P., Fragoso, S., Bursic, I., Rodolfi, L., et al. (2017). Microalgae biomass as an alternative ingredient in cookies: sensory, physical and chemical properties, antioxidant activity and in vitro digestibility. Algal Res. 26, 161–171. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2017.07.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berg, J. M., Tymoczko, J. L., and Stryer, L. (2015). Biochemistry. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Google Scholar

Bjørklund, G., and Chirumbolo, S. (2017). Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in daily nutrition and human health. Nutrition 33, 311–321. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2016.07.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castro, L., Sganzerla, W., Barroso, T., Maciel-Silva, F., Colpini, L., Bittencourt, P., et al. (2023). Improving the semi-continuous flow-through subcritical water hydrolysis of grape pomace (Vitis vinifera L.) by pH and temperature control. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 196, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2023.105894

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chalchisa, T., Zegeye, A., Dereje, B., and Tolesa, T. (2022). Effect of sugar, pectin, and processing temperature on the qualities of pineapple jam. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 22, 711–724. doi:10.1080/15538362.2022.2113598

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., He, H., and Zhang, L. (2015). A monograph of the anisophylleaceae (cucurbitales) with description of 18 new species of anisophyllea. Phytotaxa 229, 1–46. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.229.1.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corrêa, P., Moura, L., Amaral, A., Almeida, M., Souza, F., Aguiar, J., et al. (2023). Evaluation of the amazonian fruit Ambelania acida: chemical and nutritional studies. J. Food Sci. 88, 757–771. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.16455

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Curi, P. N., Nogueira, P. V., Almeida, A. B. de, Carvalho, C., dos, S., Pio, R., et al. (2016). Processing potential of jellies from subtropical loquat cultivars. Food Sci. Technol. 37, 70–75. doi:10.1590/1678-457x.07216

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Das, L., Bhaumik, E., Raychaudhuri, U., and Chakraborty, R. (2012). Role of nutraceuticals in human health. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49, 173–183. doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0269-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dhatwalia, J., Kumari, A., Guleria, I., Kumar Shukla, R., Saleh, N., El-Nashar, H. A. S., et al. (2024). Effect of altitude and harvest year on nutraceutical characteristics of Rubus ellipticus fruits. Front. Nutr. 11, 1419862–1419865. doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1419862

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duarte, S., Limão, J., Barros, G., Bandarra, N., Roseiro, L., Gonçalves, H., et al. (2021). Nutritional and chemical composition of different life stages of Tribolium Castaneum (Herbst). J. Stored Prod. Res. 93, 101826–6. doi:10.1016/j.jspr.2021.101826

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ertekin, C., Gozlekci, O., Sonmez, S., and Akinci, I. (2006). Some physical, pomological and nutritional properties of two plum (Prunus domestica L.) Cultivars. J. Food Eng. 75, 508–514. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.034

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eyduran, S. P., Akin, M., Ercisli, S., Eyduran, E., and Maghradze, D. (2015b). Sugars, organic acids, and phenolic compounds of ancient grape cultivars (vitis vinifera L.) from igdir province of eastern Turkey. Biol. Res. 48, 2–8. doi:10.1186/0717-6287-48-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eyduran, S. P., Ercisli, S., Akin, M., Beyhan, O., Gecer, M. K., Eyduran, E., et al. (2015a). Organic acids, sugars, vitamin C, antioxidant capacity, and phenolic compounds in fruits of white (morus alba L.) and black (morus nigra L.) mulberry genotypes. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 88, 134–138. doi:10.5073/JABFQ.2015.088.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Genskowsky, E., Puente, L., Pérez-Álvarez, J., Fernández-López, J., Muñoz, L., and Viuda-Martos, M. (2016). Determination of polyphenolic profile, antioxidant activity and antibacterial properties of Maqui [Aristotelia chilensis (Molina) Stuntz] a Chilean blackberry. J. Sci. Food Agric. 96, 4235–4242. doi:10.1002/jsfa.7628

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gironés-Vilaplana, A., Baenas, N., Villaño, D., Speisky, H., García-Viguera, C., and Moreno, D. (2014). Evaluation of Latin-American fruits rich in phytochemicals with biological effects. J. Funct. Foods. 7, 599–608. doi:10.1016/j.jff.2013.12.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Graça, C., Mota, J., Lima, A., Ferreira, R., Raymundo, A., and Sousa, I. (2020). Glycemic response and bioactive properties of gluten-free bread with yoghurt or curd-cheese addition. Foods 9, 1410–1417. doi:10.3390/foods9101410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Wang, Z., Barrow, C., Dunshea, F., and Suleria, H. (2021). High-throughput screening and characterization of phenolic compounds in stone fruits waste by LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS and their potential antioxidant activities. Antioxidants 10, 1–22. doi:10.3390/antiox10020234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hussain, S., Naseer, B., Qadri, T., Fatima, T., and Bhat, T. (2021a). “Apricots (Prunus armeniaca)—morphology, taxonomy, composition and health benefits,” in In fruits grown in Highland regions of the Himalayas. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 91–102. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75502-7_7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hussain, S., Naseer, B., Qadri, T., Fatima, T., and Bhat, T. (2021b). “Peach (Prunus persica)—morphology, taxonomy, composition and health benefits,” in Fruits grown in highland regions of the himalayas (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 207–217. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75502-7_16

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hussain, S., Naseer, B., Qadri, T., Fatima, T., and Bhat, T. (2021c). “Plum (Prunus domestica): morphology, taxonomy, composition and health benefits,” in Fruits grown in highland regions of the himalayas (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 169–179. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75502-7_13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ibrahim, K., Siulapwa, N., Chivandi, E., Mwambungu, A., Sichilima, W., and Erlwanger, K. (2015). Lipid profile and proximate analysis of the seeds of Anisophyllea boehmii. Res. J. Chem. Environ. Sci. 3, 22–26.

Google Scholar

IPQ (2009). Norma Portuguesa 1972 – Produtos da pesca e da aquicultura: Determinação do teor de matéria gorda livre. Lisbon, Portugal: Instituto Português da Qualidade.

Google Scholar

Iwatani, S., and Yamamoto, N. (2019). Functional food products in Japan: a review. food Sci. Hum. wellness. Beijing Acad. Food Sci. 8, 96–101. doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2019.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jacobs, D. R., and Steffen, L. M. (2003). Nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns as exposures in research: a framework for food synergy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78, 508S–513S. doi:10.1093/ajcn/78.3.508s

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Junqueira-Gonçalves, P., Yáñez, L., Morales, C., Navarro, M., Contreras, R., and Zúñiga, G. (2015). Isolation and characterization of phenolic compounds and anthocyanins from Murta (Ugni molinae Turcz.) fruits. Assessment of antioxidant and antibacterial activity. Molecules 20, 5698–5713. doi:10.3390/molecules20045698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalaba, F., Chirwa, P., Prozesky, H., and Ham, C. (2009). The role of indigenous fruit trees in tural livelihoods: the case of communities in the Mwekera area, Copperbelt province, Zambia. Acta Hortic. 806, 129–136. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2009.806.14

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, S., Bae, R., Na, H., Dal, K., and Chun, C. (2013). Changes in physicochemical characteristics during fruit development in june-bearing strawberry cultivars. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 54, 44–51. doi:10.1007/s13580-013-0166-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kirsten, W. (1979). Automatic methods for the simultaneous determination of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and sulfur, and for sulfur alone in organic and inorganic materials. Anal. Chem. 51, 1173–1179. doi:10.1021/ac50044a019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kitzberger, C., Medeiros, C., Scholz, M., Ferreira, M., Bauchrowitz, I., Eilert, J., et al. (2017). Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of plums accesses (Prunus salicina). Agric. Food. 2, 101–112. doi:10.3934/agrfood.2017.1.101

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurhaluk, N. (2023). The effectiveness of L-arginine in clinical conditions associated with hypoxia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 8205–8224. doi:10.3390/ijms24098205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lara, M., Bonghi, C., Famiani, F., Vizzotto, G., Walker, R., and Drincovich, M. (2020). Stone fruit as biofactories of phytochemicals with potential roles in human nutrition and health. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1–21. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.562252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lebaka, V. R., Wee, Y. J., Ye, W., and Korivi, M. (2021). Nutritional composition and bioactive compounds in three different parts of mango fruit. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 1–20. doi:10.3390/ijerph18020741

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lima, A., Mota, J., Monteiro, S., and Ferreira, R. (2016). Legume seeds and colorectal cancer revisited: protease inhibitors reduce MMP-9 activity and colon cancer cell Migration. Food Chem. 197, 30–38. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, H., Johnson, S., Liu, W., Dasilva, N., Meschwitz, S., Dain, J., et al. (2018). Evaluation of polyphenol anthocyanin-enriched extracts of blackberry, black raspberry, blueberry, cranberry, red raspberry, and strawberry for free radical scavenging, reactive carbonyl species aggregation, and microglial neuroprotective fffects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 461, 1–19. doi:10.3390/ijms19020461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maro, A., Pio, R., Guedes, M., Abreu, C., and Curi, P. (2013). Bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity and mineral composition of fruits of raspberry cultivars grown in subtropical areas in Brazil. Fruits-Journal 68, 209–217. doi:10.1051/fruits/2013068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martins, B., Gouvinhas, I., Cristiana, M., Peres, J., Raymundo, A., and Barros, A. (2020). Acorn flour as a source of bioactive compounds in gluten-free bread. Molecules 25, 1–19. doi:10.3390/molecules25163568

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miloševi, T., Miloševic, N., and Mladenovi, J. (2016). Soluble solid, acidity, phenolic content and antioxidant capacity. Fruits-J. 71, 239–248. doi:10.1051/fruits/2016011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mousavi, M., Zaiter, A., Modarressi, A., Baudelaire, E., and Dicko, A. (2019). The positive impact of a new parting process on antioxidant activity, malic acid and phenolic content of Prunus avium L., Prunus persica L. and Prunus domestica Subsp. Insititia L. Powders. Microchem. J. 149, 103962–103966. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2019.103962

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, D. L., and Cox, M. M. (2017). Lehninger principles of biochemistry. New York W.H. Freeman.

Google Scholar

Nkengurutse, J., Houmy, N., Mansouri, F., Moumen, A., Caid, H., and Khalid, A. (2016). Preliminary chemical characterization of amashindwi (anisophyllea boehmii Engl.) kernels and kernel oil. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 9, 1996–2005.

Google Scholar

Nkengurutse, J., Mansouri, F., Bekkouch, O., Moumen, A., Masharabu, T., Gahungu, G., et al. (2019). Chemical composition and oral toxicity assessment of anisophyllea boehmii kernel oil: potential source of new edible oil with high tocopherol content. Food Chem. 278, 795–804. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nkengurutse, J., Stoffelen, P., Masouri, F., and Moumen, A. (2021). Chemical composition and oral toxicity assessment of Anisophyllea boehmii Engl. J. Univ. Burundi 30, 1–09. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301779764.

Google Scholar

Nowicka, P., Wojdyło, A., and Laskowski, P. (2019). Principal component analysis (pca) of physicochemical compounds content in different cultivars of peach fruits, including qualification and quantification of sugars and organic acids by HPLC. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 245, 929–938. doi:10.1007/s00217-019-03233-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nunes, C., Fernandes, I., Vasco, I., Sousa, I., and Raymundo, A. (2020). Tetraselmis chuii as a sustainable and healthy ingredient to produce gluten-free bread: impact on structure, colour and bioactivity. Foods 9, 1–15. doi:10.3390/foods9050579

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okoroh, N., Duru, S., Onuoha, C., and Amadi, A. (2019). Proximate composition, phytochemical and mineral analysis of the fruits of Ficus capensis. I. J. I. R. D. 8, 83–88. doi:10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i9/sep19021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oliveira, G., Castilhos, F., Renard, C., and Bureau, S. (2014). Comparison of NIR and MIR spectroscopic methods for determination of individual sugars, organic acids and carotenoids in passion fruit. Food Res. Int. 60, 154–162. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2013.10.051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Onivogui, G., Zhang, H., Mlyuka, E., Diaby, M., and Song, Y. (2014). Chemical composition, nutritional properties and antioxidant activity of monkey apple (Anisophyllea laurina R. Br. Ex Sabine). J. Food. Nutr. Res. 2, 281–287. doi:10.12691/jfnr-2-6-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paiva, C. S., Motta, M. H., and Baptista, J. A. B. (2024). Nutraceutical value of eleven aromatic medicinal plants and azorean Camellia sinensis: comparison of antioxidant properties and phenolic and flavonoid contents. Process. Artic. 12, 10–19. doi:10.3390/pr12071375

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pandey, S., Thakur, A., and Singh, H. (2021). Evaluation of phenotypic and biochemical diversity in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and nectarine (Prunus persica (L) Var Nucipersica) cultivars in the subtropical region of Punjab. Curr. Hortic. 9, 45–49. doi:10.5958/2455-7560.2021.00007.8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramos, C., Minighin, E., Soares, I., Ferreira, R., Sousa, I., Augusti, R., et al. (2023). Evaluation of the total phenolic content, antioxidative capacity, and chemical fingerprint of Annona crassiflora Mart. Bioaccessible Molecules. Food Res. Int. 165, 112514–112519. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Redondo, D., Gimeno, D., Calvo, H., Venturini, M., Oria, R., and Arias, E. (2021). Antioxidant activity and phenol content in different tissues of stone fruits at thinning and at commercial maturity stages. Waste biomass Valorization 12, 1861–1875. doi:10.1007/s12649-020-01133-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodrigues, P., Mitterer-Daltoé, M., Vanderlei, L., Barreto-Rodrigues, M., and Pereira, E. (2021). Simultaneous determination of organic acids and sugars in fruit juices by high performance liquid chromatography: characterization and differentiation of commercial juices by principal component analysis. Cienc. Rural. 51, 1–10. doi:10.1590/0103-8478CR20200629

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Blázquez, S., Gómez-Mejía, E., Rosales-Conrado, N., León-González, M., García-Sánchez, B., and Ruben, M. (2023). Valorization of prunus seed oils: fatty acids composition and oxidative stability. Molecules 28, 1–18. doi:10.3390/molecules28207045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruffo, K., Ann, B., and Bo, T. (2002). Edible wild plants of Tanzania. Tech. Reg. Land Manag. Unit. (RELMA).

Google Scholar

Rufino, M., Ricardo, A., Edy, B., Pérez-Jiménez, J., Saura-Calixto, F., and Mancini-Filho, J. (2010). Bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacities of 18 non-traditional tropical fruits from Brazil. Food Chem. 121, 996–1002. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanfilippo, M. (2014). “Trinta árvores e arbustos do miombo Angolano - Guia de campo para a identificação,” in Cooperazione per lo Sviluppo dei Paesi Emergenti ONG COSPE. 1st ed. Firenza, Italy: Firenza.

Google Scholar

Skrovankova, S., Daniela, S., Jiri, M., Tunde, J., and Jiri, S. (2015). Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in different types of berries. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 24673–24706. doi:10.3390/ijms161024673

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trad, M., Marielle, B., Ben, H., Catherine, R., and Mounira, H. (2017). The glucose-fructose ratio of wild Tunisian grapes. Cogent Food Agric. 3, 1–10. doi:10.1080/23311932.2017.1374156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trevelyan, E., Forrest, R., and Harrison, T. (1952). Determination of yeast carbohydrates with the anthrone reagent. Nature 4328, 626–627. doi:10.1038/170626a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vos, M. B., Kimmons, J. E., Gillespie, C., Welsh, J., and Blanck, H. M. (2008). Dietary fructose consumption among US children and adults: the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Medscape J. Med. 9, 160.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., and Shao, X. (2015). Characterisation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase and the role in browning of loquat fruit. Czech J. Food Sci. 33, 109–117. doi:10.17221/384/2014-CJFS

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Anisophyllea boehmii, nutritional composition, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity (AA), organic acids

Citation: Lofa AM, Mourato MP, Prista C, Sousa I and Ferreira RB (2024) Chemical and nutritional characterization of loengo (Anisophyllea boehmii) fruits as a source of important bioactive with impact on health. Front. Food. Sci. Technol. 4:1443185. doi: 10.3389/frfst.2024.1443185

Received: 03 June 2024; Accepted: 29 November 2024;
Published: 19 December 2024.

Edited by:

Khetan Shevkani, Central University of Punjab, India

Reviewed by:

Meleksen Akin, Iğdır Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ahmed A. Zaky, National Research Centre, Egypt

Copyright © 2024 Lofa, Mourato, Prista, Sousa and Ferreira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Isabel Sousa, bG9mYWFsY2lkZXMyNUBnbWFpbC5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.