![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. STEM Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1563706
This article is part of the Research Topic Reshaping STEM Education: Strategies for Curriculum Decolonization and Institutional Transformation View all 15 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study investigates how Sámi traditional knowledge is integrated in science teacher education in Norway, and what teacher educators declare about its potential contribution to sustainable development. Data was collected through an anonymous electronic survey and analyzed by means of both qualitative and quantitative methods. 39 respondents from 15 teacher education institutions in Norway participated in the study. According to the respondents, most science courses explicitly mentioned Sámi traditional knowledge. The most common Sámi topics taught in science in kindergarten education, were the seasons, preparing traditional food, constellations and reflecting about how traditional knowledge can contribute to sustainability. For primary school teacher education, the most common Sámi topics were the constellations, conflicts with building of windmills parks in traditional reindeer grazing areas, traditional use of plants and seasons. The self-declared level of knowledge on Sámi traditional knowledge was rather low and the majority of respondents expressed the intention to improve their competence by reading or attending courses. The thematic analysis of the answers to the question about how Sámi traditional knowledge could contribute to sustainable development, identified four main Sámi themes: traditional use of resources, view of nature, local knowledge versus Sámi traditional knowledge, and social sustainability. Our results confirmed that teaching Sámi traditional knowledge poses a significant challenge for science teacher educators, both as consequence of their perceived knowledge and the limited amount of time available for teaching. Some respondents found the subject not relevant for the students, whereas other were challenged by its sensitivity or by the availability of culture bearers. The contrast between traditional knowledge and western science as different views of knowledge was also mentioned. Based on teacher educators’ perspectives, we propose that adopting a Two-Eyed Seeing approach in science teaching could promote critical thinking, by enabling a reflection on our resource utilization and on our human-nature relationship. Challenges associated with lack of time and knowledge could be addressed by promoting further education for science teacher educators, building a network of knowledge bearers , or reevaluating courses content. This would also promote decolonization and inclusion of the Sámi people, thus contributing to several aspects of sustainability.
Keywords: Decolonization, indigenous knowledge, Teacher Education, sustainability, text mining, Two-Eyed seeing, View of nature, Western science
Received: 20 Jan 2025; Accepted: 14 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Melis, Kvivesen and Munkebye. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Claudia Melis, Queen Maud University College, Trondheim, Norway
Mona Kvivesen, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 9019, Troms, Norway
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.