Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychiatry, 19 October 2023
Sec. Psychopharmacology
This article is part of the Research Topic Psychedelics as Treatments for Substance Use Disorders: Exploring therapeutic potential, risks, underlying mechanisms of action, and implementation challenges View all 8 articles

Editorial: Psychedelics as treatments for substance use disorders: exploring therapeutic potential, risks, underlying mechanisms of action, and implementation challenges

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
  • 2Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
  • 3Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
  • 4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
  • 5Center for Novel Therapeutics in Addiction Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States

Though relatively under-researched compared to mood and anxiety disorders, the therapeutic applications of psychedelics for substance use disorders (SUDs) represent important possibilities for treating conditions that inflict tremendous morbidity and mortality. In recent decades, growing rates of mental illness (1) and social isolation (2) have intersected with increasingly efficient technologies in the processing, manufacturing, and dissemination of psychoactive substances to greatly exacerbate the prevalence and harms of SUDs. While psychotherapy, mutual support groups, and pharmacological interventions are effective for some with these conditions, for too many they prove inadequate means for ensuring long term recovery. For example, in an open label trial of sublingual buprenorphine vs. monthly-administered extended release naltrexone in opioid use disorder, at 24 weeks 57 and 65% of patients had relapsed, respectively (3). Other studies have identified a 40% attrition rate from 12-step recovery groups within the 1st year of joining (4) and a 30% attrition rate for psychosocial SUD treatments in general (5). Numbers like these clearly indicate that novel approaches to treating SUDs are needed—could psychedelics help fill the gap?

In this Research Topic, we present seven articles exploring the therapeutic potential of classic and non-classic psychedelics for SUDs. Recognizing that psychedelic research has been prone to hype (6) and that unique questions related to potential therapeutic applications of psychedelics in patients with SUDs (such as psychedelics' addictive potential in this population) remain open, we sought to curate an article collection providing a balanced take on the current state of knowledge for this exciting, though sometimes controversial topic.

Zafar et al. present a wide-ranging review of observational studies and clinical trials investigating the therapeutic effects of classic and non-classic psychedelics in SUDs. They also extensively discuss different translational human neuropsychopharmacology techniques (such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography) that should be employed in future work to enhance mechanistic understanding of how psychedelics might treat SUDs.

Whinkin et al. explore the treatment potential of ketamine for depression, anxiety, and psychosocial/spiritual distress in patients with SUDs, via a 2-year chart review on 18 patients with problematic substance use receiving ketamine-assisted psychotherapy. Statistically significant reductions in anxiety and depression rating scores were observed, suggesting further investigations in this area are warranted.

Goldfine et al. reviewed the human literature on the therapeutic potential of ketamine for alcohol use disorder (AUD), as well as alcohol withdrawal. Their findings regarding AUD included studies reporting reduced cravings, reduced alcohol consumption, and longer abstinence in patients receiving ketamine treatments, with longer periods of abstinence associated with receiving more psychotherapy sessions. The authors also identified literature demonstrating earlier resolution of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) and delirium tremens with the adjunctive use of ketamine in patients receiving benzodiazepine therapy during severe alcohol withdrawal.

Phan and Terry systematically reviewed the human literature on psychedelics, including ketamine, in the treatment of cannabis use disorder (CUD), a condition that has received relatively little attention in psychedelics research thus far. The authors identified one article assessing the open-label use of ketamine in conjunction with motivational enhancement therapy (MET) and mindfulness-based relapse prevention treatments for CUD. Patients in that study had a statistically significant reduction in cannabis use, though there were only eight participants. The authors also identified data from a placebo-controlled study of the serotonin 5-HT2c agonist lorcaserin in non-treatment seeking daily cannabis smokers indicating decreased cannabis use, though data were only reported for less than a week. Lorcaserin is not a psychedelic, though 5-HT2c agonism may play a role in psychedelics' potential anti-addictive properties, since this modulates dopaminergic activity in the ventral tegmental area-nucleus accumbens reward pathway (7).

Rounding out articles on human data, Brett et al. present a mini-review on psilocybin-assisted therapy for methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), a condition for which current pharmacological treatments offer little to no efficacy, and discuss the rationale for investigating psilocybin-assisted therapy for this indication. The authors note that since psilocybin-assisted therapy has demonstrated promising findings in clinical trials for AUD and tobacco use disorder, the possibility of transdiagnostic treatment potential justifies exploring its potential in MUD.

Zhornitsky et al. explore the potential of neuroplasticity as a therapeutic mechanism for psychedelics in patients with SUDs, as well as mental health conditions, by systematically reviewing the effects of psychedelics on markers associated with synaptic density. They found most eligible studies have investigated the non-classic psychedelic ketamine, with mixed findings for synaptic changes in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex when ketamine is administered in single or repeated doses. Fewer studies have been conducted for other psychedelics, though these data indicate that markers associated with synaptic density can be enhanced under basal conditions and that stress-associated deficits can be reversed. Taken together, these findings suggest that psychedelics' abilities to normalize abnormal levels of synaptic markers in some brain regions could contribute to their treatment potential for SUDs.

Finally, in a compelling perspective piece, Black argues for an increased focus on the potential of psychedelic treatments for patients with SUDs. To do this demands that we work toward equitably employing psychedelic therapies, rather than maintaining the status quo in mental healthcare, which would likely see them primarily restricted to use in wellness markets or patients who are commercially insured. Among other points, Black observes that recruitment and training of diverse psychedelic clinicians, collaboration with mutual support groups, and a willingness to provide access to psychedelic treatments to higher-risk individuals in need of complex care will be essential to maximizing the potential societal benefits of psychedelic assisted therapy.

In summary, these articles provide a valuable view into the emerging field of psychedelics as potential treatment for SUDs. With growing interest among researchers in exploring this line of inquiry, we expect this Research Topic will prepare readers for deeper future engagement with an area of research that could yield important assistance in humanity's quest to ameliorate the widespread suffering wrought by SUDs.

Author contributions

BB: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft. AB: Writing—review and editing. NS: Writing—review and editing. JW: Writing—review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

BB holds stock options in CB Therapeutics. He also serves on advisory boards for CB Therapeutics and Compass Pathways. He receives monetary compensation from DynaMed Plus (EBSCO Industries, Inc.) for editorial work and from Janssen Pharmaceuticals for consulting services. BB has received research funding from MindMed. NS acts as a consultant to Resa Health.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. COVID-19 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. (2021) 398:1700–1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Kannan VD, Veazie PJ. US trends in social isolation, social engagement, and companionship – nationally and by age, sex, race/ethnicity, family income, and work hours, 2003-2020. SSM Popul Health. (2023) 21:101331. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101331

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lee JD, Nunes EV Jr, Novo P, Bachrach K, Bailey GL, Bhatt S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2018) 391:309–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32812-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kelly JF, Moos R. Dropout from 12-step self-help groups: prevalence, predictors, and counteracting treatment influences. J Subst Abuse Treat. (2003) 24:241–50. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00021-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lappan SN, Brown AW, Hendricks PS. Dropout rates of in-person psychosocial substance use disorder treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. (2020) 115:201–17. doi: 10.1111/add.14793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Yaden DB, Potash JB, Griffiths RR. Preparing for the Bursting of the Psychedelic Hype Bubble. JAMA Psychiatry. (2022) 79:943–4. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Canal CE, Murnane KS. The serotonin 5-HT(2C) receptor and the non-addictive nature of classic hallucinogens. J Psychopharmacol. (2017) 31:127–43. doi: 10.1177/0269881116677104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: psychedelics, ketamine, psilocybin, addiction, substance use disorder

Citation: Barnett BS, Bassir Nia A, Sackett NB and Weleff J (2023) Editorial: Psychedelics as treatments for substance use disorders: exploring therapeutic potential, risks, underlying mechanisms of action, and implementation challenges. Front. Psychiatry 14:1305478. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1305478

Received: 01 October 2023; Accepted: 09 October 2023;
Published: 19 October 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Roberto Ciccocioppo, University of Camerino, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Barnett, Bassir Nia, Sackett and Weleff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Brian S. Barnett, barnetb3@ccf.org; @BrianBarnettMD

ORCID: Brian S. Barnett orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-5701

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.